Metal Gear Solid 2 was awful IMO. MGS(1) was a masterclass in gaming though.
However, Splinter Cell offers much more in terms of stealth and movement than Metal Gear Solid though MGS has a massive fanbase which sticks by it.
Oh no not the splinter cell MGS arguement, MGS wins by a mile
People argue that there is no games on the PS3 and there is a vast amount more on 360. Once MGS4, GTA4, COD4, PES2008, Ratchet, Uncharted, Wipeout HD, Burnout and GT5 Prologue are out within the next 5-6 months it won't be as good an arguement, the prices won't have changed and the 360 will still be as unreliable. Also do you really get the time to play through all these games that aren't as good as Bioshock, Halo and Mass Effect?
In the long term the PS3 to me is far more capable and has showed that the AAA titles are in the works. The only ones I have seen so far on 360 are Ninja Gaiden 2, Mass Effect, Alan Wake (although coming to PC and we don't know much about it yet) and Too Human.
To be honest I'm more excited about MGS, FF13 and Versus, Killzone 2, UEDA's game, GT5 and God of War 3 but that's just my taste so buy what you want and be happy
I've never understood anyone saying this. What makes you think that? I'm not having a dig, but I just see so many people say it and I have absolutely no idea why.
When the 2 consoles are so evenly balanced in terms of power it's bizarre that people would say it.
Well for one the PS3 hasn't seperated their install base with the hard drives so potential titles in the future that need to use the hard drive won't be a problem on PS3. I also think people underestimate the space developers get on Blu-ray and the potential it has and like I said earlier I believe future games are more appealing in the long term.