• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Crysis demo benchmarks

Uriel

Uriel

Uriel

Soldato
Joined
15 Jan 2006
Posts
7,811
Location
Derbyshire
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/1211/2/page_2_benchmark_results/index.html

Looks like they couldn't get the HD2900XTs to work at 1920x1200. Is that what other people are finding or did they just set something up wrong?

Edit: Just spotted that these are on DX9, WinXP SP2 so no DX10 performance here!
%20crysisspd_g_01.gif

%20crysisspd_g_02.gif

%20crysisspd_g_03.gif
 
Last edited:
Hmm, better than I was expecting.
Looking at that I should be able to get around 45fps on my GTS320 at Medium settings.
 
I think they're average frameratest thought, so might not be as playable as the figures suggest. Mind you, with a bit of motion blur it lower framerates can be disguised a little.
 
still not good enough for me, won't be playing crysis until a card is out that can play it 40fps minimum at 1680x1050 in dx10 - I won't settle for dx9 or medium dx10.


Roll on HD3800!
 
Roll on something. I'm still hopeful that RV670 is going to offer more performance than just a R600 die shrink but I wouldn't bet on it.

Maybe the rumoured dual GPU cards will be enough?
 
About spot on for what I'm getting at 1680 x 1050 on a GTS

Definitely getting a 9800 GTX when they're out though
 
Uriel said:
Roll on something. I'm still hopeful that RV670 is going to offer more performance than just a R600 die shrink but I wouldn't bet on it.

Maybe the rumoured dual GPU cards will be enough?
Click to expand...

Well it supports dx10.1 and the dx10.1 specifcation has some pretty high requirements for hardware to meet so it must have a fair number of optimisations and since it's 45nm who knows!
 
mrk said:
Well it supports dx10.1 and the dx10.1 specifcation has some pretty high requirements for hardware to meet so it must have a fair number of optimisations and since it's 45nm who knows!
Click to expand...
its 55mm not 45mm... plus dx10.1 is pointless at this time... the 3000 series won't be much different than the 2900
 
Last edited:
Ati would be mad not to give the 3800 more performance. Looking at the performance of the gt if there xt can't even compete with that i think its pretty much another blow for them. Saying that if its near on performance and its price is somewhere around the 120-130 mark and the pro a little lower then they still can get something out of this round. Also looking at the power and heat coming from the gt i think the new ati will beat it in those departments something cyber mav will be happy about lol.
 
Last edited:
Stephen B said:
my 1st real test of rig other than futuremark stuff yields 59fps [2nd and 3rd loop] 1280X1024 all settings high and aa off
Click to expand...


Thats a pretty high end machine you got there also and a lot of money spent by the looks of it. No aa also which with a rig like that most people would be expecting to use aa.
 
TheRealDeal said:
Thats a pretty high end machine you got there also and a lot of money spent by the looks of it. No aa also which with a rig like that most people would be expecting to use aa.
Click to expand...


AA was off by default all I did was set res to a comparable rate

just done a run with 16xq 45fps crashed on 4th loop [xp pro, 2g ballistix pc2-8500, raptor x]
 
Last edited:
TheRealDeal said:
Ati would be mad not to give the 3800 more performance. Looking at the performance of the gt if there xt can't even compete with that i think its pretty much another blow for them. Saying that if its near on performance and its price is somewhere around the 120-130 mark and the pro a little lower then they still can get something out of this round. Also looking at the power and heat coming from the gt i think the new ati will beat it in those departments something cyber mav will be happy about lol.
Click to expand...

It does not even need to be any better than the 2900 ;) If it's the same performance @ 60% Power/heat requirements 2 in crossfire are going to be perfect....also single card users will have double GPU option cards !

The published review suggests the 8800GT is a hot running power hungry card, OK fantastic bang/buck ratio but will still be shy in the performance department for high res gamers
 
JAKUS said:
It does not even need to be any better than the 2900 ;) If it's the same performance @ 60% Power/heat requirements 2 in crossfire are going to be perfect....also single card users will have double GPU option cards !

The published review suggests the 8800GT is a hot running power hungry card, OK fantastic bang/buck ratio but will still be shy in the performance department for high res gamers
Click to expand...

Hot running due to sinlge slot design and **** cooler but not power hungry. It uses far less than a 8800 GTS and about half of a 2900XT. Not bad for something that matches a GTX.
 
SS-89 said:
Im getting an average of 35fps on High dx9 Vista 64 at 1280x1024 :/
Click to expand...

I found it unplayable on high settings 1280 x 1024. Was ok on medium though.

Vista 64
3.2ghz C2D
4GB RAM
2900PRO flashed to XT.

Might start overclocking the graphics card, might be worth a few FPS.
 
I find the game run quite good for a demo in XP: all high and medium shaders at 1650x1050 no AA and I get an average of 35 fps using the in game benchmark :p

Planning to play it on XP this year and next one with better hardware in Vista DX10 ;)

I did that with Far Cry and when I replayed (only game I have ever replayed) with Windows 64 bit + HDR and better hardware looked much better, like a different game ;)
 
I find the game run quite good for a demo in XP: all high and medium shaders at 1650x1050 no AA and I get an average of 35 fps using the in game benchmark :p

Planning to play it on XP this year and next one with better hardware in Vista DX10 ;)

I did that with Far Cry and when I replayed it (only game I have ever replayed) with Windows 64 bit + HDR and better hardware looked much better, like a different game :eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom