Crysis Bonus Pics

Thats my business, I was happy to answer the peeps question above as he asked nicely and I know some like to stir up a hornets nest here crying Warez.

BUT I DO NOT have Crysis, and the Photos are as they were from the game, obv its not the ingame graphics we see as you aint in the FPS view and I dont think thats a 3rd Person view, its more like a spectators view.

The Disc also has 2 Movies, you have seen on web (one with Shark) and Art etc.

REMEMER, I had to make them Photos into small jpg's, they were each upto 12MB in size and upto 3818x2633 in RES.
 
Last edited:
i don't know but pictures has better quality then actual game maybe we will experience that sort of graphics with new gen cards or pictures was shined by some tool to look better then the actual game :cool:
 
You have got to remember (check other offical Thread) the Crysis we got is nowhere as nice as the Crysis that was plugged all year on the web, judge for yourselfs.

I remember being blown away by the Videos and Photos (which normally cant do a game its full deserved justice, you need see actual gameplay).

I know many peeps here do not like Crysis getting slated, but to me it looks nice but not that nice for some parts like humans, and it plays like FarCry and is very boring after a while (hope full game wanders of the path a bit).

comparisonshotxt0.jpg
 
Last edited:
Thats my business, I was happy to answer the peeps question above as he asked nicely and I know some like to stir up a hornets nest here crying Warez.

BUT I DO NOT have Crysis, and the Photos are as they were from the game, obv its not the ingame graphics we see as you aint in the FPS view and I dont think thats a 3rd Person view, its more like a spectators view.

The Disc also has 2 Movies, you have seen on web (one with Shark) and Art etc.

REMEMER, I had to make them Photos into small jpg's, they were each upto 12MB in size and upto 3818x2633 in RES.

Yarr Matey, Your parrot fell off :p.
 
See a thread ruined by cry babies, just as I knew it would all because they cant help themselfs buy using words that I carefully do not use.

Some peeps actually enjoyed the pics and I took the time to upload to an Album.

I will simple pull all the pictures from my Album np's.
 
Last edited:
I thought the comparision shot was particularly telling. I'm starting to think that was actually FMV now, using ingame assets. (like the intro sequence in the demo with the developer credits) The footage that top screen was taken from was made over a year and a half ago and ran at 60fps. There was no way it could be actual gameplay running on hardware at the time.
 
Yeah, besides, Crysis is still the best looking game currently out - and those graphical settings seen in the older trailers can always be used when the hardware becomes available.
 
You have got to remember (check other offical Thread) the Crysis we got is nowhere as nice as the Crysis that was plugged all year on the web, judge for yourselfs.

I remember being blown away by the Videos and Photos (which normally cant do a game its full deserved justice, you need see actual gameplay).

I know many peeps here do not like Crysis getting slated, but to me it looks nice but not that nice for some parts like humans, and it plays like FarCry and is very boring after a while (hope full game wanders of the path a bit).


In some parts of the demo the lighting comes through right with sun beams and all just ony in very small areas for a breif time as sun rises.

Hopefully they will be better in full game.
 

Regardless of whether the first picture is touched up or not, the second picture is a bad example and is in fairly different scene to the first pic.

Just playing the demo at high on an x1900 card has revealed graphics that are on par with the pre-release screenshots. I think it's more the case that the pre-release shots were cherry picked rather than touched up.
 
Back
Top Bottom