High backed booster is needed, a booster on it's own you might as well not bother as the safety is rubbish. The side protection is what's needed mainly.
Saves ya some dosh too![]()
Just checked mine and at 2 years and 1 month weighing 18 kgs puts a boy over the 99.6th centile, anything over that is out of the normal/average range.
We bought a car seat that does for our 10mth old (she's forward facing now), right up to when she's 10 or 11 - if it lasts that long, it will be the only car seat we will need.
It has bits that come off it and adapt as the baby turns to toddler and then a young child. Saves ya some dosh too![]()
Think we only paid £35 for it mind. But pretty sure we'll need to buy another anyway - not likely to last 11 years.![]()
Once they are older boosters are fine IMO
The young one that has been in my life recently (just turned 4) has a high-backed booster but he's getting a bit tall and a bit wide for it now. It'll just be a normal booster before long as his high-backed one will start to be uncomfortable for him.
They're not fine though. In a crash a normal booster does not protect them at all. The range of high backed boosters on the market now means that nearly every child will fit them. High backed booster don't lift them higher off the normal seat than the simple boosters so the higher wouldn't be an issue. They are so wide that it wouldn't be a problem either. All tests have shown the high backed boosters are far safer especially in side impacts. A just 4 year old will have no problem in the high backed boosters. Safety is paramount.
Oh now im told by the wife that james (the bigger one) has always been in the top of the top and michael not far after
Oh in that case yours is alto cheaper! I was expecting the £200 mark like some of hem are..
I don't know how we'd have coped if we had twins.![]()
High backed booster is needed, a booster on it's own you might as well not bother as the safety is rubbish. The side protection is what's needed mainly.
[TW]Fox;10603520 said:I thought the reason for a booster was to enable the seatbelt, sized for larger children and adults, to function correctly?
[TW]Fox;10603520 said:I thought the reason for a booster was to enable the seatbelt, sized for larger children and adults, to function correctly?
Looking at that video I can't see how the outcome for the child with a regular booster cushion is any worse than a 16 year old sitting in the seat without a booster at all.
Height difference? The tests have been done and are there, I'm just interested in the safest option for my children.
Right so i think i'll get so new ones, maybe the evolva 23 one however do you know any sites that have widths of the seats on?
[TW]Fox;10603543 said:Well the point of a booster is to remove the height difference. The side impact thing is a seperate issue - a booster is there in order that the a conventional seatbelt can be used safely and properly in the event of a forward impact. It is not there for side impact purposes and from the video you have posted is no more dangerous in a side impact than my example of a 16 year old in the same seat without the booster.
Plus the level of injury sustained and even whether there would be any injury at all in said side impact depends entirely on the car involved.
Booster seats are not and should not be considered a form of side impact protection. It is not their purpose.