Im going to open a can of worms......
I think hamiltons time was a lie
To say hamiltons lap was smooth is OTT imo as he had a terribl start and bogged down, cut the hammerhead and messed up the last corner, it was hardly a "wet" lap either
it was damp at best.
you cant def the law of pysics, thinking hamilton can corner as quick i nthe wet as another formula 1 driver can i nthe dry is absolutely stupid.
granted hamilton is quick but not 3 seconds quicker than another formula 1 driver.
would hamilton of challenged for the f1 title in a honda or sauber etc, i dont think so.
could someone like button of challenged i nthe mclaren i think so.
point is all the drivers in formula 1 are all exceptional drivers and the person at pole is not 3 seconds faster than the person in 10th or 12th for example tthe time differences in formula 1 are tenths of a second!!
yet hamilton made up 3 seconds over a short track. hmmm
its taken top gear months and months to get hamilton on the show and even then his dad had a say in it and i bet mclaren had rules etc wrote into the appearance contract or whatever he had to sign.
its in TG's best interests to make him look exceptional
next time its wet on the roads try and take your car for a blast where you normally like to drive and see if your happy cornering at the same speed you would when it was dry. doesn matter how good a driver you are you simply wont be able to because of the law of pysics.
if the car has no traction it has no traction doesnt matter what the driver does with the pedals or the steering wheel
do people seriously think hamilton can take a corner on wet track at the same speed as another formula one driver (mansell/button) can in the dry?
oh come on and get real
Clarkson couldnt of been further up lewis's rear if he wanted to.
wonder why top gear only show half the lap and not the full lap......stops people timing it doesnt it
