Forceware 169.17

fornowagain · 7 Dec 2007 at 00:15

Forceware 169.17 Vista x86

Forceware 169.17 Vista x64

Forceware 169.17 XP x86

Forceware 169.17 XP x64

MumboJumbo · 7 Dec 2007 at 00:17

Improvements in crysis? COme on people get a move on its only gone 12 there is still time!

Rackerz · 7 Dec 2007 at 00:26

Another one, what's new this time?

Bony Maloney · 7 Dec 2007 at 00:26

Thanks for the heads up.

steve258 · 7 Dec 2007 at 00:27

Jeez Nvidia has been churning out drivers like there's no tomorrow!

Will give it a go a bit later if I can still be bothered when I get home.

Tom|Nbk · 7 Dec 2007 at 00:30

Changelog?

Baka^Ni · 7 Dec 2007 at 01:41

Quick crysis gpu benchie and I'm up by 2fps, nice one nvidia, finally a real measureable improvement.

Reflections are still bugged though.

dbmzk1 · 7 Dec 2007 at 01:55

Tom|Nbk said:
Changelog?

steve258 · 7 Dec 2007 at 03:41

Crysis Benchmark WinXP 32bit DX9 High 1680*1050 0xAA 0xAF:

169.09:
min:14.73 avg:33.61 max:39.56

169.17:
min:14.45 avg:33.60 max:39.92

No difference at all, for SLI users I think or we just have to wait till the 1st crysis patch.

krisbutler · 7 Dec 2007 at 09:24

css bench 40fps up to 287fps with an bfg 8800gts 640mb and in game is around that much higher too

eyetrip · 7 Dec 2007 at 09:32

krisbutler said:
css bench 40fps up to 287fps with an bfg 8800gts 640mb and in game is around that much higher too

Gotta love it when the only gains are made in games that don't really need em

lay-z-boy · 7 Dec 2007 at 10:50

I'm seriously behind on drivers after just a week and a half, got some serious testing to do when my internets gets fixed later on today

randal · 7 Dec 2007 at 10:56

steve258 said:
No difference at all, for SLI users I think or we just have to wait till the 1st crysis patch.

Which was due today, as Crytek said it would be between 7-14 days.

http://www.incrysis.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=559

The NV/Crysis lie machine rolls on...

waso_dude · 7 Dec 2007 at 11:01

krisbutler said:
css bench 40fps up to 287fps with an bfg 8800gts 640mb and in game is around that much higher too

CSS is cpu limited tbh.

deuse · 7 Dec 2007 at 11:03

Thanks for the heads up

Greenboi · 7 Dec 2007 at 11:07

Here you go guys

169.09:

05/12/2007 17:23:36 - XP

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.52

169.13:

05/12/2007 17:31:12 - XP

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.515

169.17:

07/12/2007 00:29:30 - XP

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 38.185

Greenboi · 7 Dec 2007 at 11:09

randal24 said:
Which was due today, as Crytek said it would be between 7-14 days.

http://www.incrysis.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=559

The NV/Crysis lie machine rolls on...

sry for double post but the patch was due on the 30th of November, theyre 7 days overdue

mishima · 7 Dec 2007 at 11:19

How come these aren't released on the nVidia site?

MumboJumbo · 7 Dec 2007 at 12:28

Perhaps the patch is made to help AA in games?

Things change I've changed · 7 Dec 2007 at 12:37

randal24 said:
Which was due today, as Crytek said it would be between 7-14 days.

http://www.incrysis.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=559

The NV/Crysis lie machine rolls on...

boy does it ever, you want to believe in these people but you can see from that interview they are talking out their ass, they must know surely that people can see that.