Imitation Samurai swords too be banned!!

The top one is England and Wales (I presume) the bottom one is Scotland.

What's so unbelievable about 50 people being shot to death last year? Remember that handguns are illegal in the UK, shotguns are not.

I was looking at those figures before, they're on an anti-gun website. I believe that the figures given are accurate, however the conclusions drawn are somewhat shaky at best :) Like I've said, both sides are as bad as each other for propaganda.

By shot to death i meant with any gun, 42 percent of those where with handguns.
 
What have video games got to do with anything? :confused:


Don't you know they turn you into crazed killers. This is the trouble with current politics. Popular opinion wins. Popular opinions is 99% made of emotions and not facts. The government is meant to side with minorities as well as the majority. One of the things it should be doing is making laws on facts not emotions.
 
fireqs6.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]



Looks like we're still killing each other with firearms well with the ban.

Source ?????

Or did you make it up in paint??? :p
 
It's safe to say the average person is pretty sensible and level headed unlike the majority here who seem to be weapons obsessed due to playing way too many violent video games!!

oh i missed this, i keep thinking she's going to actually make a decent at least debatable argument, like scorza tries, but it keeps coming back to petty insults and lies..

You will be happy to know the latest respectable surveys say games have sod all to do with people being homicidal maniacs :)
 
LOL
Hardly, my stats I posted were definitive to HANDGUN deaths which I think is rather relevant when talking about the HANDGUN ban :rolleyes:
 
Source ?????

Or did you make it up in paint??? :p

Same as I got the details about homicides rising since the ban of firearms, the very same PDF you posted :rolleyes::p

LOL
Hardly, my stats I posted were definitive to HANDGUN deaths which I think is rather relevant when talking about the HANDGUN ban :rolleyes:

Not at all, our argument is that the murders will still take place just with a different item (be it handguns or swords that are being banned)... making the ban a completely pointless act.
 
LOL
Hardly, my stats I posted were definitive to HANDGUN deaths which I think is rather relevant when talking about the HANDGUN ban :rolleyes:

the second picture shows that 42% of all the crimes where with hand guns.

And it still came from the pdf you posted.


edit: just in case you still haven't read your own pdf.





Again its time for

Failboat.jpg
 
Last edited:
but it keeps coming back to petty insults and lies..

lol

What a hypocrite, wanna post that pic again ???


But you seem to have missed the whole point of the gun ban, let me make it easy for you:

IT WAS NOT TOO REDUCE GUN CRIME OR GENERAL HOMOCIDES, IT WAS DONE TO PREVENT ANOTHER DUNBLANE MASSACRE.


Get it???
It was a sensible law, guess why??? Because something stupid like 85+% of MASS SHOOTINGS are committed with LEGAL GUNS! (look at the STATS!) :rolleyes:
 
lol

What a hypocrite, wanna post that pic again ???


But you seem to have missed the whole point of the gun ban, let me make it easy for you:

IT WAS NOT TOO REDUCE GUN CRIME OR GENERAL HOMOCIDES, IT WAS DONE TO PREVENT ANOTHER DUNBLANE MASSACRE.


Get it???
It was a sensible law, guess why??? Because something stupid like 85+% of MASS SHOOTINGS are committed with LEGAL GUNS! (look at the STATS!) :rolleyes:

No it's not sensible it's emotional.
So some nutter kills a few people. The gun clubs even advised the police he shouldn't have a license.

A few killings is not worthy or just to ban the entire sport. Especially when alternative laws could have been used. But yet again Labour pandered to the emotional public.
 
lol

What a hypocrite, wanna post that pic again ???


But you seem to have missed the whole point of the gun ban, let me make it easy for you:

IT WAS NOT TOO REDUCE GUN CRIME OR GENERAL HOMOCIDES, IT WAS DONE TO PREVENT ANOTHER DUNBLANE MASSACRE.


Get it???
It was a sensible law, guess why??? Because something stupid like 85+% of MASS SHOOTINGS are committed with LEGAL GUNS! (look at the STATS!) :rolleyes:

So its going to take just one mass shooting in the UK and you will be totally OK with reversing the ban, since it obviously not working.

So how many is a mass shooting ?

10

15

?

Is your argument looking ridiculous enough yet ?
 
lol

What a hypocrite, wanna post that pic again ???


IT WAS NOT TOO REDUCE GUN CRIME OR GENERAL HOMOCIDES, IT WAS DONE TO PREVENT ANOTHER DUNBLANE MASSACRE.

what's insulting about fail boat, you asked me for my source accused me of making it up, when it was where you got your info from.

also no the ban was to stop murders with guns not just rampages, and if it was just to stop a dunblane why ban hand guns when he used an ak47 for most of it?


And in light of the posts above, which did this much more succinctly than my i will take yo up on your offer.

dasfailboot.jpg
 
Here you are, look at the FACTS!

57272584ec2.png


23498356pu6.png



Too say that the Gun ban being introduced to help prevent another 'Dunblane' was stupid and doesn't work is ridiculous when you look at the cold hard FACTS above!!
 
Here you are, look at the FACTS!

Too say that the Gun ban being introduced to help prevent another 'Dunblane' was stupid and doesn't work is ridiculous when you look at the cold hard FACTS above!!

So why ban swords, when was the last sword massacre?

Also it seams the most bloody massacre (35) was committed with a stolen and hence illegal gun even though your "facts" list it as legal, with only a little small print to explain.
 
Last edited:
lol

What a hypocrite, wanna post that pic again ???


But you seem to have missed the whole point of the gun ban, let me make it easy for you:

IT WAS NOT TOO REDUCE GUN CRIME OR GENERAL HOMOCIDES, IT WAS DONE TO PREVENT ANOTHER DUNBLANE MASSACRE.


Get it???
It was a sensible law, guess why??? Because something stupid like 85+% of MASS SHOOTINGS are committed with LEGAL GUNS! (look at the STATS!) :rolleyes:


with the amount of gun crime involving kids recently its only a matter of time before one of these young phycos takes his gun to school and starts a killing spree.
 
Not at all, our argument is that the murders will still take place just with a different item (be it handguns or swords that are being banned)... making the ban a completely pointless act.

We don't know what the homicide rate would have been had handguns not been banned. Remember that in the last 10 years we've seen a massive increase in immigration and liberal policing practices such as abolishing stop-and-search, which I would suggest is responsible for a large slice of the increased homicide rate. It's no coincidence that since the police have started stopping and searching again the homicide rate has fallen.

As has already been said, the purpose of the handgun ban wasn't to stop criminal related activity - even if handguns were legal, it'd be a foolish crim that used a legal one to kill someone. The purpose of said legislation was to stop the massacres like Hungerford and Dunblane - we can't know for sure if it's worked, but so far so good. Since Columbine school massacres have grown in popularity around the world, so it's a good thing imo that depressed, bullied, screwed up teenagers don't have access to guns in this country.
 
Personally I can't see why anyone would want these things but a ban seems a bit overkill

It's not as if you can go out at night with one concealed on you like you could with a regular knife, if a nutter can't get one of these he will find something else
 
Back
Top Bottom