Been there already - ran a 1.6 Bora from 2000-2005. After 50k in the final 2 years it needed £800 in maintenance. So for the reasons above it had to go.
It's costing me under £60 a month for the fixed costs (tax, insurance and servicing) on the Fabia. A bargaintastic depreciated repmobile would cost less upfront, but would it consistently cost that much to run a month and start every morning for 3+ years?
We'll agree to disagree.
[TW]Fox;10721002 said:From a 90bhp car?
Hello, my name is Steve, and i like diesels.
Performance isn't all about the power. It's the performance of that car, it doesn't have to do 0-60 in 6 seconds, or top out at 150mph.
I love the smooth output of our pug, i've been a passenger is a new beemer petrol and it failed to interest me, needed lots of reving.
My car instantly fell to pieces when it hit 50k... oh wait.
I don't know exactly what my car costs each month but quite frankly I'd rather pay the extra not to have to drive around in a diesel supermini.
Point still applies, my car has nearly 138,000 on the clock (and Fox's has nearly 160k) and both start first time, every time![]()
Point still applies, my car has nearly 138,000 on the clock (and Fox's has nearly 160k) and both start first time, every time![]()
Performance isn't all about the power. It's the performance of that car, it doesn't have to do 0-60 in 6 seconds, or top out at 150mph.
I love the smooth output of our pug, i've been a passenger is a new beemer petrol and it failed to interest me, needed lots of reving.

[TW]Fox;10721044 said:Now I find that hard to believe becuase you know how much I hate stupid uber high revving engines - my hatred for VTEC is well publicised on this forum. A BMW 6 is nothing like it, but I'd really rather this thread didn't degenerate into a BMW arguement becuase I'll just get flamed. BMW Sixes are effortlessly smooth. Infact they are regarded as some of the smoothest engines on the planet.

[TW]Fox;10721044 said:To say that a 1.9TD offers smooth power delivery where a 6 cylinder BMW does not is ridiculous. Don't forget, I've owned both of those engines. The 1.9TD has its place, but you really are over-egging it a tad here.
Performance isn't all about the power. It's the performance of that car, it doesn't have to do 0-60 in 6 seconds, or top out at 150mph.
I love the smooth output of our pug, i've been a passenger is a new beemer petrol and it failed to interest me, needed lots of reving.

Doesn't matter what car you have, 90hp is wheezy, mine weights under a tonne and its slow.
Also, I think you will find the rpm figure at which peak bhp is made, is directly proportional the the fun when you press the right pedal down a bit![]()
The pug has twice the power of my car! And there is plenty of fun to be had driving it, at times i've got it up to 50mph!

A car with 45hp is fun? You need help![]()

[TW]Fox;10721044 said:To say that a 1.9TD offers smooth power delivery where a 6 cylinder BMW does not is ridiculous. Don't forget, I've owned both of those engines. The 1.9TD has its place, but you really are over-egging it a tad here.






[TW]Fox;10720930 said:But the point is that his initial criteria is based on the misconception that a diesel car is bulletproof and will last for ever and that a petrol car will not.
If his criteria were based on solid reasoning, sure. But they are not. There are things he has not considered![]()