Care to illuminate us all who know less on the subject of Leeds United?
What Gilly doesn't say is that Leeds unsettled the player before making an offer, obviously the player wanted to leave and lost interest in playing at L2 level. Because of the financial troubles they wern't allowed to sign him permanently so he went on loan for 6 months, as Barnet didn't want a player who wanted to leave.
So as it was a loan we lost the top scoring striker in league 2 for nothing, and had no extra money to sign an immediate replacement. Then the permanent transfer happened at the end of the year, but because of the problems with the CVA and HMRC the full transfer money agreed wasn't paid, whether that was £100k or £200k i don't know.
However what i do know is that it's a huge ammount for a small club, and the attitude presented by Leeds throughout the whole situation was not in the spirit of the game, they unsettled the player and trod on the little team in the process.
Gilly - Call it a whinge if you want but Leeds shouldn't have been signing players that they couldn't afford at the time, the CVA and HMRC problems were caused by Leeds Utd in the first place, so you can't really claim innocence when other clubs were dragged into it.
Edit* May i also quote from the Barnet FC website (August 07)...
"The club message underlines that Barnet have, as yet, not recieved any money from Leeds Utd for the transfer of Tresor Kandol last year".
The permanent transfer was in Jan '07.