I doubt the power of current science technology could manipulate or control what's called random factors.
A dice, a coupled pendulum, or a deck of cards shuffled etc. are all examples of random factors
Say a dice, you know its starting position (height), starting angle relative to landing surface, you let go of it inside a vacuum tube to eliminate crosswind and/or air resistance etc. and keep repeating the freefall of it ==> There's still no guarantee whatsoever it will keep outcoming a number you had predicted it should. (the 1st drop lands a "6", what guarantees the 2nd would give you another 6? apart from the statiscal possibility of 1/6 ?)
Same as a coupled pendulum, even practised in vacuum, with same force applied to same starting position every single time, and 10 tries would yield 10 totally different orbits.
It's not hard if you think about it, time and place are 2 factors that have changed, when you do the 2nd attempt of the same experiment, the Earth (or I should say the universe) is not at the same time/position as it was for the 1st attempt anymore, so even if everything else holds the same, something that plays an impact has not been kept constant. You can eliminate time difference by doing 2 identical experiments next to one another, but then they can't overlap their places either, and the Earth's mavity on the 1st set of apparatus is not guaranteed to be the same as on the 2nd set, just to name 1 exernal force.
As for the deck of cards, people believe if you keep shuffling it for an unimaginably large number of times, it may come up to the organized state when it 1st came out of the box, true, but I'd like to see mankind take a shot at it with a robot purely designed for unbiased shuffling and see how long it may take. "Forever" is also an outcome for this challenge.
Bottomline, unless you are god, there's no way you can control random factors. And the diversity of possible outcomes are what makes life itself and how unpredictable it appears.
.
