Goth who walks fiancée on a leash is banned by bus driver who told: 'No dogs allowed'

your double standards make your insults pretty laughable.
Click to expand...

Not that is not double standards. KKK and Swastika's are plainly obvious why they're offensive, as both part of a violent group that was intent on genocide.

Someone with a tattoo of a kitten isn't.
 
badbob said:
Not that is not double standards. KKK and Swastika's are plainly obvious why they're offensive, as both part of a violent group that was intent on genocide.

Someone with a tattoo of a kitten isn't.
Click to expand...

makes no difference your saying it's ok to discriminate against one group of people for their beliefs but not another, a lead is obviously offensive to some people how are they less important than those offended by the kkk or swastika.


To the best of my knowledge your allowed to be nazi or a kkk member just so long as don't incite violence or perform violence your self.

You can be Christian or Muslim however if the pope calls for a crusade on Muslims or Muslims leaders a jihad on Christians you can't take part least not in this country.

Your free to believe and be a member of what you want as long as you follow the law.


You can't have it both ways.

How do you think a woman who was a victim of sexual abuse and degradation would feel about seeing this?

Is her offence less valid than your own?
 
Tefal said:
makes no difference your saying it's ok to discriminate against one group of people for their beliefs but not another, a lead is obviously offensive to some people how are they less important than those offended by the kkk or swastika.


To the best of my knowledge your allowed to be nazi or a kkk member just so long as don't incite violence or perform violence your self.

You can be Christian or Muslim however if the pope calls for a crusade on Muslims or Muslims leaders a jihad on Christians you can't take part least not in this country.

Your free to believe and be a member of what you want as long as you follow the law.


You can't have it both ways.
Click to expand...
Quoted for sense.

Remember, society tells us things are bad.
 
badbob said:
However it is that persons right to wear whatever clothes they like, as long as not exposing there genitals (unless it's a nudist beach) Bunch of intolerent and short minded people here:rolleyes:

Would you agree that a bus driver refusing someone with tattoos is ok too? (as long as not KKK, Swastika etc)
Click to expand...

The bus driver can legally refuse to accept their custom on any grounds providing they aren't descriminating on race, religion (select cases) and gender so if they want to refuse for tattoos it is perfectly legal. As Dolph said early on the bus driver is free to do so just as people are free to judge said bus driver for doing so.

I might not agree with the bus driver for acting in such a way but I recognise their right to do so, if you want to claim freedom of speech and action then you need to accept it extends to even those you disapprove of (except perhaps where it will harm another).
 
The wearing of a lead is an act of submission (voluntary or not) and as such has no place in a society that is supposed to treat everyone equally. I find them very offensive, not their looks but the statement they are trying to make - they are being deliberately provocative. There is clearly a sexual element to what they are doing, they are free to indulge themselves in private and good luck to them but it is not acceptable in public. They will grow up one day I suppose.

That said they are probably much better behaved than most of the scum and freaks that I have been unfortunate to share a bus with. :D
 
1) Yes, the driver can refuse to have them on the bus.
2) No, the driver can't assault them in the process of denying them entry.
3) Yes, a lead is a bit weird, and does indeed connote power and dominance.
4) Yes, she has a great rack.

In related news, the wording of the article is hilarious. The couple, who live on benefits in a council house and plan to start a family. It's just begging for the rabid Daily Wailers to come out in force. The only way it could be bettered is if they were immigrants.
 
i wouldnt mind getting myself a pet like that kinder kinky what shops sell them and do they stay faithful or do they go off with any old stranger that strokes there tummy ;)?
 
vonhelmet said:
1) Yes, the driver can refuse to have them on the bus.
Click to expand...

But shouldn't, in my opinion if he can't based on other certain factors.

vonhelmet said:
2) No, the driver can't assault them in the process of denying them entry.
3) Yes, a lead is a bit weird, and does indeed connote power and dominance.
4) Yes, she has a great rack.

In related news, the wording of the article is hilarious. The couple, who live on benefits in a council house and plan to start a family. It's just begging for the rabid Daily Wailers to come out in force. The only way it could be bettered is if they were immigrants.
Click to expand...

The rest I agree with completely :)
 
vonhelmet said:
Yes, she has a great rack.
Click to expand...
For a bunch of people who spend a higher than average time on the internet, some of you lot have a very questionable sense of a great rack. I would illustrate but I fear bannage would result ;)

vonhelmet said:
In related news, the wording of the article is hilarious. The couple, who live on benefits in a council house and plan to start a family. It's just begging for the rabid Daily Wailers to come out in force.
Click to expand...
Not only them, us lefty Guardian readers would also question why they are incapable of getting jobs. If it's a lifestyle thing, she could stay at home chewing the furniture while he stackes the shelves in Summerfield.
 
WillyNelson said:
For a bunch of people who spend a higher than average time on the internet, some of you lot have a very questionable sense of a great rack. I would illustrate but I fear bannage would result ;)
Click to expand...

indeed i like how whenever a celebrity etc is posted everyone says pfft way below may standards etc, then this comes up and we get great rack :confused:








I'd still hit it though
 
Yet more benefit-scrounging losers grabbing headlines and stealing hard-earned money from hard-working tax-payers. All people physically and mentally able to work should be forced into jobs of some form, whether it be community service or similar. There's simply no excuse for choosing not to work when you are fully aware that you are capable and you will be living off the state, whether you want to live like a freak or not!

As for the bus driver... yes he was in the wrong but ffs those two really need to get a life.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom