Couldn't agree more. Wenger complained about Everton saying they didn't allow his team to play flowing football and we ground out boring results with physical presence. But that to me is just another tactic to counter Arsenal's type of play, it's like complaining we had this great game plan but the other team turned up and their players got in the way
yes but at the end of the day, i could support Chelsea when they won the title, or i could support whoever wins the title every year. winnings nice, but not everything, winning a title is nice but how long does it really effect your mood. losing the CL final was bloody awful, but after a week it was merely a dissappointing memory. AT the very end of the day since i started watching football i fell into supporting arsenal because it was the most enjoyable to watch.
I'd prefer to lose a game playing good football, than win a game playing the dullest game of all time. End of the day i want to enjoy the 90 min game. When a team does everything, including breaking the rules of the game by fouling on purpose to stop our style of football because they can't match our passing its frustrating and more than that, leads to boring games. Its entertainment, thats it. THe win against, i dunno, trying to think at the moment, say Fulham earlier this year, i was happy about the win THEN, i don't feel happy or sad about it now, i can remember it wasn't a great game, mostly because we played like crap admitedly. but this is my point i don't feel one way or the other about that game now, but i can't remember any fantastic football. I can think back to the 7-0 victory and not be happy about the result but remember a freaking awesome display of attacking football and thats what matters to me.
Frankly i'd rather shoot myself than support a team that plays like pool/chelsea did today if they played like that in general. Its just damn boring, i mean it was an atrocious game. Being a sport, and being effectively just entertainment its very irritating when a team goes out of its way to stop another team being entertaining. Especially if those teams CAN and DO play good football in other games, but rather than try just assume they would lose playing their best football, they on purpose play a different less entertaining way. but hey everyone has different opinions, thats fine. but i prefer to watch a blackburn say villa game, than a blackburn arsenal game, as it will most likely be a more enjoyable game.
Do 100metre's runners with no chance of winning purposely trip the rest in an attemp to win, or just do there best and make it the closest and best race it can be. If blackburn play their best football, it has beaten arsenal and man u and i assume pool and probo chelsea at some point. If its possible, why not try, it will make a better game for everyone involved. even in general this physical/defensive approach rarely works, you might get a couple of draws extra a year, playing for draws is boring, for everyone. Hell even wengers tried the 4-5-1 physical approach, by far and away our most boring games of the past 5 years and also, we've done consistantly worse playing defensively than offensively.
Edit:- another point would be, Man City, away, could have gone ultra defensive and fouled the crap outta man U (honestly, Hamann was no worse than usual at all

) but they attacked, a Lot, and they were very entertaining. even though man u were fairly poor, not on purpose, the game was great to watch because there was a lot of simply, great football, some very good attacking and some superb defending. had they gone away and defended and refused to attack it would have been a dull game.