Have exams really changed that much?

Soldato
Joined
30 Jul 2004
Posts
2,837
Location
Auckland
Just wandering a clients site and found that it is now 150 years since Cambridge Assessment started writing exam questions.

Examples of 1858 exam questions:

Obtain the sum of forty-six times seven thousand and twenty, seventeen times one million and one, and thirty-three times thirty-three.

Name in order the Queens and the children of Henry VIII. On what grounds was he divorced from his first wife?

In what three ways was our Lord tempted in the wilderness?

The comments that were given by the examining body 150 years ago
“Their answers, even when accurate, showed a general uniformity of expression which seemed to imply that meagre handbooks had been placed before the Students to be ‘got up’ and that little attempt had been made by their instructors to excite the interest of their pupils by questionings or remarks of their own.”


“There was little indication of an acquaintance with the best elementary mathematics works.”


Source
http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/ca/Keynotes/Article?id=116803

Found it quite interesting as these actually look a lot easier than the questions I remember from GCSE. So actually maybe we have been teaching kids a little better after all!
That said those comments could just have easilly been a quote from this weeks papers rather than a quote from 150 years ago!
 
cathrine of aragon
anne bolyn
jane seymore
anne of cleves
kathrine howard
kathrine something else

IIRC.
 
This so called increase in the intelligence of young people today evident from good exam results doesn't seem to translate into real life though does it. :rolleyes:
 
So how is it any fairer to compare exams from 40 years ago to modern exams?

If I go back to when I took my A levels around 45% passed and 5% got an A grade ( plus the fact that a smaller, higher calibre number of cnadidtaes took A levels anyway )

Now the pass rates are about 90% and 20% getting A grades ( I think ) , there is no way that education levels have increased that far
 
Yes they can answer answer exam questions, but are seemingly incapable of independent thought and common sense and any form of social etiquette.

Although they do serve some tasty burgers thats for sure.
 
Current GCE/GCE examinations are possibly the most annoying things ever.
I take the science subjects (biology chemistry and physics) and I can sit an exam where I know and thoroughly understand everything on the paper, and get a B, because of the way the mark schemes work. It's not a case of how much you know, it's a case of setting it out in the same way that it's set out on the mark scheme.

If you aren't very bright, but are capable of learning standard answers, and have the time to go through all the past papers, an A grade is achievable, without actually understanding the subject.

The fact that standard answers are what are needed makes exams more and more a measure of effort, and not one of understanding or intelligence.
 
If I go back to when I took my A levels around 45% passed and 5% got an A grade ( plus the fact that a smaller, higher calibre number of cnadidtaes took A levels anyway )

Now the pass rates are about 90% and 20% getting A grades ( I think ) , there is no way that education levels have increased that far

The exam boards set the pass rate by increasing or decreasing peoples marks depending on how well people do across the country. Doesn't mean the exams are easier. The exam system is a shambles anyway, just rote teaching and people not understanding the subject properly, if exam systems were more synoptic then it might be different.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom