I still have DVD players that are ancient going strong. I highly doubt the HD-DVD drive will go... it's not a PS3 BR drive you know.
I still have DVD players that are ancient going strong. I highly doubt the HD-DVD drive will go... it's not a PS3 BR drive you know.
HD DVD would have won if MS had put it into the 360. the reason it won was because the PS3 had it and was the cheapest player around as well as a next gen console. DVD was the same, didnt really get noticed until the PS2 was released.
I don't think MS wanted either format to win tbh.
Correct, they want downloadable content to win.
This has nothing to do with consoles.
This has nothing to do with consoles.
This has nothing to do with consoles.
We've still got our first DVD player (proline 1000)
Sinny said:HD DVD would have won if MS had put it into the 360. the reason it won was because the PS3 had it and was the cheapest player around as well as a next gen console. DVD was the same, didnt really get noticed until the PS2 was released.
I dissagree, Joe public don't really bother about such things as storage space etc they just want to buy into the next big thing. All the PS3's sold having BD player built in definately made a big impact on BD sales as there were not as many standalone BD players sold as HD-DVD players yet the BD discs still outsold HD-DVD discs by a significant margin.Unlikely imo, I think the larger capacity of Blu-ray is a sole reason for HD-DVD to be beaten. Generally choosing an optical storage media with a lower capacity that doesnt offer any benefits to make it just seems like a backwards step, especially considering that the difference is about 20Gb (DL).
It has infinately increased my lust of a PS3. So yes it does. I'm sure it will make the PS3 more attractive to the 'aware' public too.This has nothing to do with consoles.