DIC To Make Fresh Buy-Out Bid For Liverpool

When did I say Everton would win the league ? I think you should open your eyes !
As a comparison look where Everton are compared to us with what Moyes has.
Moyes has been at Everton for nearly 6 years. Do you think they would be where they are now if they sacked him when they weren't doing so well during the 2005-2006 season when they finished 11th? The board gave him time and support and he came through it and has steadily improved Everton.

Stop making sad excuses up for Benitez. He is the problem not the owners.
Clueless!
 
DIC's public 24hrs unltimatum should turn the pressure up, imo they will be back with another deal should Hicks fail to budge...
 
I don't know anything about these situations but would it not be in DIC's interest to at least buy Gillette's share at least that way they can make things awkward for Hicks and maybe force him to sell.

Not sure what sort of impact this would have on the club or from the fans mind. :)
 
I don't know anything about these situations but would it not be in DIC's interest to at least buy Gillette's share at least that way they can make things awkward for Hicks and maybe force him to sell.

Not sure what sort of impact this would have on the club or from the fans mind. :)

no good if hicks can veto gillette selling the shares to DIC.
 
Hicks wants to sell but not just yet unless the price is too good to turn down.

Hicks has been trying to sell off part of his holding company (the company that owns 50% of Kop football ltd which owns the club) which all his sports sides are under. His stake in Liverpool is seen as the main asset of this company and he knows that selling his stake in us now would make it harder to sell off part of his holding company. It's thought that Hicks even had the cheek to offer DIC a stake in his holding company back in January which DIC turned down knowing his other sides offer little value.

Regardless of all that im still almost certain that Hicks will sell eventually. Despite Hicks' claims that he can stop Gillett selling, all Hicks has is first option should Gillett decide to sell. It is very possible that Hicks could find a way to raise the money however under the agreement he only has 90 days to do so before Gillett can take DIC's money, i also doubt whether he'd want to buy all the club or whether Gillett would sell to him.

If Gillett sells his 50% to DIC then its just a matter of time before Hicks is all but forced to sell; the fans, board and DIC/Gillett are all against him and with the board having the casting vote over all decisions (should Hicks and whoever owns the other 50% disagree) then he can't win.
 
Moyes has been at Everton for nearly 6 years. Do you think they would be where they are now if they sacked him when they weren't doing so well during the 2005-2006 season when they finished 11th? The board gave him time and support and he came through it and has steadily improved Everton.

Clueless!

ERrm, yes moyes had a semi bad season, but again look at the differences. He's building a club and bringing them up, he's bought them a long way. Liverpool were an established top 4 side before Benitez joined. Everton were most certainly not, 11th based on a few years before isn't bad for Everton, where if pool who'd been a top 4-5 team for a lot longer had dropped that much it would have been a monumental error.

Benitez is the problem, Lucas has looked ok/good in some games, but the biggest wins against the likes of derby and well, some other terrible teams don't make Lucas a great player, he's been truly truly awful in a lot of games.

Benitez buys lots of very very average players. He also buys a lot of semi great players who just aren't consistant. Torres was overpriced, everyone else gave up on him because he was a completely inconsistant player and he is a fairly poor finisher. hesky could have scored a hatrick against boro, they left an open goal twice for him and the 3rd was shocking defending aswell. West Ham are having a big dip in form at the moment also with even in their best form a defence massively prone to mistakes in every position.

I'm sorry but you only have to look at what liverpool say and how they play. They are just really bad in way to many games. Both the manager, and most of the players like Gerrard recently insist they have the players and the squad and are fed up of always playing for next year. though, the question has to be asked. if they HAVE the players AND the squad, then why aren't they top???????

Because both Gerrard, and other players, and Benitez believe they do have the squad. they've said it for the last 3 years, and yet failed to get anywhere near the title. Surely a good manager would say he didn't have the right players or the squad. Its one of three things, the players,the tactics or a combination of both. Either way the manager is to blame.

All this scapegoating of your owners who dumped a large chunk of money on players. You forget, they did buy everyone Benitez wanted, what exactly else do you expect of them? Do you want them to go and buy players for the manager and insist he play them like at Chelsea? Or did you want them to tell Benitez he could have the money to replace the entire squad? even though the manager and the star players seem to think they have the right squad as it is?

You can bring in a billionaire, but if the manager says he has the squad and only wants a couple of key players, and they gets them and you still suck. Is that the owners fault of the manager for being completely unable to recognise whats going on.

You're biggest "big game" player was probably Garcia, selling him was a horrific mistake. He consistantly scored in the CL and against the top 6 in the prem, perfect for Rafa's rotation, but got crap from the fans for not scoring against the bottom half of the table.

Oh well, campaign to get rid of the owners who have done exactly as your manager has asked, and make sure you keep the manager who doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell of winning the title in the next decade.

Both Gerrard and Benitez both seem incapable of recognising why they aren't top. They both insist there is nothing wrong at all, but they just aren't top. Doesn't that give you a slight worry that neither are capable of taking you to the top?
 
drunkenmaster

As has been pointed out before, you are completely and utterly clueless.

There's so many inaccuracies with your post above it's hard to know where to start putting you right, and if that's even possible.

Oh, and you write too much.
 
He makes several good points, and the main one - either the players or the manager are to fault, and essentially even if it's the players at fault, it equates to the manager being at fault since he's bought them and is now playing them.

Benitez is poor. Face it :/

I hope that was more succinct.
 
It's been argued many times before on this forum, There really is no need to go through it all again, and even if there was, I really really can't be assed, especially as it's drunkenmaster, who is in all probability, likely to be drunk.
 
Last edited:
Ive been told an interesting slant on the takeover.....

From what ive been told it may not be Hicks that is holding up the takeover but actually Gillett. Like i said in my last post Hicks can't sell atm because he's trying to sell off part of his holding company but according to what ive been told, he has agreed to sell his shares to DIC once that has been sorted and its Gillett holding out for more money. When Ansari (DIC's CEO) said that one of the yanks was in dreamland over the valuation, he may have been talking about Gillett.

Not sure how accurate that is as all the reports are saying its Hicks that is unwilling to sell but who knows.
He makes several good points.
no he doesn't.
 
Back
Top Bottom