Ridiculous comment

Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
95,522
Location
I'm back baby!
Worse than a Keegan moment this one:

LEYTON Orient have threatened legal action against promotion rivals Leeds United if their 15-point penalty is reduced, according to reports.

The Yorkshire club have appealed against the punishment for breaking rules on insolvency and their case will be heard by an independent arbitration panel next month.

Fellow League One promotion chasers Doncaster Rovers are also believed to be considering legal action if Leeds' appeal is successful.

O's boss Martin Ling told the Daily Mail: "Rest assured that if we finish sixth and lose the final play-off spot to Leeds on a courtroom appeal, we'd be straight back in court and the whole episode would drag on.

"My big gripe with any change now is that we've been involved in a race all season in which Leeds have been 15 points behind us all. Indeed, we've factored that into all our plans."

A Leeds spokesman said: "As long as this matter is resolved by the end of the season the outcome will be decided purely on performances on the pitch which surely must be the right place.
advertisement

"It is difficult to believe that any club has not tried to win every game this season.

"We are seeking for on-the-field performances to be the only defining factor in terms of promotion and relegation."

Firstly, how can you factor the points of a different team into your plans? Through a miscarriage of justice a team has to deal with the loss of 25 points, and it affects a completely different team how? Surely they all go out to win their games every week regardless? :confused:

Secondly, how could they threaten Leeds with legal action? If the right decision is taken it wouldn't be Leeds' fault, like it isn't their fault the decision was taken to dock the points in the first place.
 
With Sheff Utd?

I doubt we'll ever know exactly what went on there. Too many conflicting stories.

The Leeds thing is all out in the open though. We can speak about facts relating to this, not cloak and dagger third party owners with other third parties having interests, etc.
 
Yeah, that's the one.
Sheffield United wanted to take West Ham to court rather than the panel that decided the outcome, seems a similar circumstance.

If they find Leeds innocent, then that's that, it's their decision.
 
It is an absolutely crazy thing to say but they won't finish in the top six anyway so it makes no odds. It's sort of similar to the Donny chairman saying there would be "problems" if we got the 15 back, but ultimately it has got sod all to do with them now. I think we will get some of the points back now but I can't see us getting the whole 15 even though we should.
 
Absolute idiot.

Let's just hope if it does go to appeal that Ling makes that much of a tit of himself in the courtroom.
 
Whether or not the points deduction was right or wrong it shouldn't be changed as it would throw the whole league in dispute, nobody wants promotion to be decided in the courtroom.

What happens if the deduction is overturned and Leeds get pushed into an automatic promotion spot and the team who get pushed down into the playoffs get knocked out. Cue non stop legal battles that could continue well into next season, resulting in an absolute mess.

Sometimes clubs get screwed over by the FA, it's not the first time and won't be the last, all you can do is bite your lip and get promotion the next year to prove them wrong.
 
Whether or not the points deduction was right or wrong it shouldn't be changed as it would throw the whole league in dispute, nobody wants promotion to be decided in the courtroom.

What happens if the deduction is overturned and Leeds get pushed into an automatic promotion spot and the team who get pushed down into the playoffs get knocked out. Cue non stop legal battles that could continue well into next season, resulting in an absolute mess.

Sometimes clubs get screwed over by the FA, it's not the first time and won't be the last, all you can do is bite your lip and get promotion the next year to prove them wrong.

I agree.

Otherwise where would you draw the line for appeal decisions during a season?

Hypothetically a team could be 'mathematically' safe from relegation (or even guaranteed a play off place) with say 6 games to go. They may then decide to rest players, or experiment with some youth players - and then 2 weeks later they could find out that a team below them had had an earlier punishment overturned and that they were now facing the possibility of finishing further down the league than had earlier been 'mathematically' possible.

I know that this isn't the case in this situation, as the appeal should (?) be heard/decided before it gets too close to the end of the season.

But the league made a decision at the start of the season and IMO they have to stick with it. Overturning the decision mid-season would IMO bring the whole league setup into disrepute. Potentially you could have the Premiership 'champions' beaten on the final day of the season, by an overturned deduction to another team from earlier in the season.
 
Anybody would think it was Leeds that have been dragging this on given the above posts! All we have ever wanted is a independant appeal and the FL have been dragging this on for months as they known the punishment is on very dodgy ground.
 
Anybody would think it was Leeds that have been dragging this on given the above posts! All we have ever wanted is a independant appeal and the FL have been dragging this on for months as they known the punishment is on very dodgy ground.

Could be worse...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jhtml?xml=/sport/2007/06/11/sfnbos11.xml
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/essex/7280939.stm

...and of course my own personal (shamelessly biased) favorite...

1992 said:
...(Barnet) lost the vast majority of their promotion winning side in a tribunal which nullified the players' contracts.

Only club in the history of the league to have the entire squad given free transfers 2 weeks before the season started.

As i said, it could be a lot worse, at least you're playing/watching good quality football :p
 
Leyton Orient have issued the following statement to "clarify" the incendary comments made by their manager, Martin Ling, yesterday which implied that Orient would themselves go to law if Leeds United won back their 15 points at the April tribunal and it subsequently affected Orient's potential promotion to the Championship:

"Following reports in some sections of Thursday's media, the club (Leyton Orient) can clarify its position as follows: Any quotes attributed to Martin Ling regarding the Leeds United arbitration case are personal and not those of Leyton Orient FC.

"Martin's comments were taken out of context and were not meant to reflect directly on Leyton Orient FC's position on the matter. This matter will be addressed directly with the newspaper first responsible for publishing his comments.

"Leyton Orient FC will be making no further comment on either the quotes attributed to Martin Ling or on the Leeds United arbitration case."

Pretty much says 'Leyton Orient will not be doing what our manager says, and he will have a good kicking for being as silly as he was :p
Whether or not the points deduction was right or wrong it shouldn't be changed as it would throw the whole league in dispute, nobody wants promotion to be decided in the courtroom.

So if it was wrong Leeds should just suck it up? :confused: It was disgusting the way it was handled and the league need to be brought to task, otherwise what's to stop them screwing someone else over? it's about time they were made to answer for their decision :)

What happens if the deduction is overturned and Leeds get pushed into an automatic promotion spot and the team who get pushed down into the playoffs get knocked out. Cue non stop legal battles that could continue well into next season, resulting in an absolute mess.
That would be a shame, but it would mean that the club that was 'pushed down' into the playoffs didn't deserve an automatic promotion spot. If they did they'd have enough points. The only team playing on an uneven keel is Leeds, through no fault of their own. That they were wrongly given a points deduction should neither be here nor there for the clubs around them.

Sometimes clubs get screwed over by the FA, it's not the first time and won't be the last, all you can do is bite your lip and get promotion the next year to prove them wrong.
No, the club should fight, as should any other club that gets screwed over, else it'll keep happening.
I agree.

Otherwise where would you draw the line for appeal decisions during a season?

Hypothetically a team could be 'mathematically' safe from relegation (or even guaranteed a play off place) with say 6 games to go. They may then decide to rest players, or experiment with some youth players - and then 2 weeks later they could find out that a team below them had had an earlier punishment overturned and that they were now facing the possibility of finishing further down the league than had earlier been 'mathematically' possible.

I know that this isn't the case in this situation, as the appeal should (?) be heard/decided before it gets too close to the end of the season.

But the league made a decision at the start of the season and IMO they have to stick with it. Overturning the decision mid-season would IMO bring the whole league setup into disrepute. Potentially you could have the Premiership 'champions' beaten on the final day of the season, by an overturned deduction to another team from earlier in the season.

If the league setup would be brought into disrepute the league themselves need to look at whether docking points is the way forward.

I find it difficult that someone is advocating the removal of points as a punishment with no right of appeal!
As i said, it could be a lot worse, at least you're playing/watching good quality football :p

To be fair, no we're not. We're playing League 1 football.
 
If the league setup would be brought into disrepute the league themselves need to look at whether docking points is the way forward.

I find it difficult that someone is advocating the removal of points as a punishment with no right of appeal!

I'm not going to disagree with anything you've said there. :D I think that the league need to have more foresight and understand that there will be more and more cases going through the courts. If they don't improve the way the handle the deduction/appeal process then I can see it won't be long before it becomes fairly common for relegation/promotion to effectively be decided in the courts.

My point was not that Leeds, or anyone else, shouldn't have a right to appeal - but more that the league need to have some clear guidelines as to when point deductions can occur, and a time limit for hearing an appeal. There's no reason for these things to drag on so long, and as you've already said (at least I think it was you who said it) - it isn't Leeds who have been dragging their feet.

When I posted - 'But the league made a decision at the start of the season and IMO they have to stick with it. Overturning the decision mid-season would IMO bring the whole league setup into disrepute.'

I wasn't suggesting that there shouldn't be a right to appeal. Just more that, if the League dock points then you would hope that they are as certain as they could be, that they won't overturn that decision at a later date. Sadly IMO, I don't have that faith in the league and I can see them changing their mind over quite a few decisions in future. It is this lack of faith in their decisions and the fact that they are happy to wait so long before coming to a 'final' decision that could IMO bring the league setup into disrepute.

Hope that clarifies :)
 
Back
Top Bottom