Good little test...

That test is old and I can't believe they've nabbed it for cycling as it's all to do with colour perception.
 
13, and I saw the bear just as it was going off screen, not quick enough I suppose

edit: rewatching it the bear can't really moonwalk :/
 
13 and no. It's a psychological thing which I can't remember the name of, saw it on some programme the other day. Quite interesting actually.
 
As said in OP, may be old, but i guess if like me you missed it the 1st time, then its not too bad :) and it is a little funny too :)

ANd today with all thats going on in work i need funny.
 
TBH why would anyone have seen it? im pretty sure you would just be following the ball around, not taking any notice of the people in black or the bear or whatever...so its a pretty pointless 'test'

and yes i got 13
 
I agree, if the bear was in white you would have spotted it, but since it was black and you were told specifically to concentrate on the white then you dont. Nothing spectacular about that :)

gumbald said:
That's the point. When you're driving, you're looking for cars not cyclists...
Click to expand...


You should be looking for everything, cars, cyclists, motorbikes, pedestrians, dogs, children. I have always been told to expect the unexpected when driving and thats what i do .
 
If the bear wasn't wearing dark clothes and paying attention to where it was going then I'd have seen it.

Whatever happened to "Be Seen, Be Safe"?

Let's all blame the motorists because some cyclists are a bunch of *****.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom