Columbia shot down by a UFO??

If you could invent a way of getting into space that was no more expensive then jet airliner travel then you wouldn't be able to see the sky for spaceships.

Well that's true on occasion : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSKu2tlgoRY&feature=related

I just don't understand why with all the evidence and testimonials floating about ufos/aliens are such a taboo subject with governments and mainstream media. That is unless the governments have something to fear. I don't think it's inconcievable that they've been warned about there destructive ways.
 
Last edited:
Imagine it is announced that we have been visited, you would get the "End of the world" mob throwing themselves of the nearest building, fear, panic and mass hysteria.

The simple fact is that if we have been visited it puts into context what a little backwater we are and how we are technologically feeble. I know that sounds a bit flippant but you get my point.
 
Imagine it is announced that we have been visited, you would get the "End of the world" mob throwing themselves of the nearest building, fear, panic and mass hysteria.

The simple fact is that if we have been visited it puts into context what a little backwater we are and how we are technologically feeble. I know that sounds a bit flippant but you get my point.

I think there's a bit more to it than that. I doubt these more adavnced spieces have credit cards, mortgages, fractional reserve banking, managed elections and all the shams we're taught is the norm and to uphold. Basicaly a scenario could come about in which the people in power are no longer in power and therefore have vested interest in maintaining things as they currently are.

Also if it became public knowledge that the government has with held and even suppressed knowledge of something as monumental as ETs our governments would be damaged beyond repair and be no longer viable.
 
Last edited:
050223columbia.jpg


Further photographic analysis has recently been completed on a series of five photos taken by an amateur astronomer on a San Francisco hill at 5:53 am on February 1, 2003, showing the Space Shuttle Columbia being hit by what appears to be a lighting bolt shortly before it crashed seven minutes later. According to David Sereda, who conducted the photographic analysis, the length of the five exposures conclusively show that it was not a form of 'super' lightning that hit the Columbia, but an advanced plasma beam weapon of some kind. Sereda documented his analysis in a recently released video, From Here to Andromeda, extracts of which were uploaded this week to YouTube. The series of five photos were originally submitted to NASA to help it in its investigation of the Columbia tragedy by the astronomer who chose to remain anonymous. His submission of the photos to NASA was covered by a reporter from the San Francisco Chronicle and appeared in a story on February 5, 2003. The reporter claimed: "In the critical shot, a glowing purple rope of light corkscrews down toward the plasma trail, appears to pass behind it, then cuts sharply toward it from below. As it merges with the plasma trail, the streak itself brightens for a distance, then fades."

http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-59.htm


The original photograph has been withdrawn at the demand of the photographer.
The graphic here just shows the altitude of the disaster, along with an electrical interpretation of the withdrawn photograph.

http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/050223columbia.htm
 
Last edited:
Why is it in the past 50 years we've hardly made any progression in space travel?

The same reason that the 747 is still the worlds most used aircraft 50 years after it was first produced.

Once you reach a peak it's very hard to go further without a significant technological leap.
 
lol said:
Further photographic analysis has recently been completed on a series of five photos taken by an amateur astronomer on a San Francisco hill at 5:53 am on February 1, 2003, showing the Space Shuttle Columbia being hit by what appears to be a lighting bolt shortly before it crashed seven minutes later. According to David Sereda, who conducted the photographic analysis, the length of the five exposures conclusively show that it was not a form of 'super' lightning that hit the Columbia, but an advanced plasma beam weapon of some kind.

Conclusively eh?

It's ok magick I went through the same phase as you when I was about 15. The forum you need to go post on is this one here, you'll be right at home http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/index.php?showforum=7
 
yeah i went through a similar phase. UFO's have been spotted on many space flights even video tapped the point is we know very little about space and the way it affects things this there probably just natural :D

dont just look at one source of data and one point of view


+ conspiracy theories kinda suck and isn't plasma (i mean real plasma like st elmo fire) not that dangerous
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom