But the card came from an unknown source, I know that because I actually read the review.
This might interest you also.
http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33918735
so an NDA card came along from ATi obviously as Nvidia love to hand their cards out over there, so this ATi guy sent the wrong drivers over
We all knew it wasn't going to be great, so what.
AS to if they "had" to rehash old tech, yes they did. You guys are missing the "business" aspect here. The 8800gtx might have been the fastest single core, but it doesn't matter. ATi are making massively cheaper cores, put them together and in all likelyhood making a much higher profit on the X2 than Nvidia was on their "faster" 8800gtx. In terms of money, and this is something very few people seem to notice, ATI has wiped the floor with Nvidia.
The mid/low end 8000 series came out at the SAME time as ATi's mid/low range, except ATi's had better features and were cheaper. The 2900xt was always supposed to be a 65nm part, 65nm sucks hard at the fabs where they are making them.
Nvidia DID have to rehash their stuff as they simply couldn't compete on pricing vs ATi. Ati were making a lot more cores per waifer, on the whole range, and Nvidia were losing money its as simple as that. Without a "new" 8800 or the 9800 they'd be screwed. Without the 8800gt/new gts them simply wouldn't have sold more than 10 cards total since the 3870 release which would have been half the price for similar performance.
ATi have done magnificently, they've dragged computing back to value, Ok the quads are iffy , untill later this month, but then you've got £120 quad cores, looking set to be sub £100 quads easily by the end of the year. Midrange price now gets you the high end part in graphics cards, they've taken £200 of the price of the ultra high end part, as opposed to nvidia who were happy to add £50 to the top end part every single generation.
Yes we "might" have a faster part, though its unlikely, from nvidia had it not been, but that next 9800 "real next gen" ultra would have been £500.
Once sales on the 9800gx2 are known to be utter crap they will drop to £280-320 range to compete with ati which hopefully nvidia will be held to for the next few generations to come aswell.
AS for Vista drivers, especially 64bit, nvidia still haven't got total stability in 64bit, let alone a fast driver set. I thought the whole idea was we can either get fast drivers, or stable. From day one of the 2900xt launch there have been stable 64bit vista drivers from ATi on a monthly release. Yes they do tend to do a hotfix here or there, but every nvidia driver release, like the crysis one, seems to entail 10 separate beta/final sets over the space of 2 weeks. I love that Crysis, a TWIMTBP game, took a SINGLE ATi driver to work perfectly for me.
This is why i have a not altogether perfect phenom, against my Q6600 it performs IDENTICALLY in GAMES< although benchmarks it sucks. Maybe if you really won't ever see the difference you should throw your support to the guys who fight really hard to bring you better value, service and support.