Paul Mcartney / Heather Mills

So she got £6 million per year for being married to him, plus the value of whatever he paid for during the marriage, plus a huge amount of publicity from being married to him that no doubt lined her pockets some more.

I would have married him for a tenth of that. I'd be a much cheaper prostitute.
 
I'm going to quote somebody from another forum that I pop in now and then who put it so eloquently and he's got it spot on :

I wonder if those of you whom so vehemently despise the woman actually KNOW why you harbour such a hatred for her? Because The Sun said she was an evil, conniving, gold digger? Much like millions of other women then who have milked their husband for all they're worth when coming out of a messy marriage then, the gritty details of which we know nothing about. It may seem a lot but McCartney is nigh on a billionaire, and I'd wager that proportionately, the % asset split is far less than commonly seen in the divorce courts.
 
I wonder if those of you whom so vehemently despise the woman actually KNOW why you harbour such a hatred for her?

I dislike her and this whole thing because she actively wanted media attention. I do not want my beloved BBC News 24 being polluted by a attention seeking whore every time I watch it thank you very much.

It's her affairs, I just wish she would keep it to herself.

Burnsy
 
I dont think any one really cares other than the newspapers.

I couldnt give a damn how much money she gets or what conclusion it comes to. I would rather read about something more interesting.
 
I wonder if those of you whom so vehemently despise the woman actually KNOW why you harbour such a hatred for her? Because The Sun said she was an evil, conniving, gold digger?
Okay, you're quoting someone else but that's incredibly patronising.
I'll occassionally flick though a tabloid while at work but I feel in no way influenced by any of the stories.

I don't hate her, in fact I don't hate anybody for that matter. I simply have very little respect for individuals who continuously highlight their achievements and ongoing efforts in terms of charity, as Heather does.

Its embarrasing.

The BBCs news schedule this evening summed it up - the credit crisis which will effect just about everyone, immediatley followed by Heather complaining about 35k a year for Beatrice and not being able to afford 1st class travel.

Genius.
 
I'm going to quote somebody from another forum that I pop in now and then who put it so eloquently and he's got it spot on :

I wonder if those of you whom so vehemently despise the woman actually KNOW why you harbour such a hatred for her? Because The Sun said she was an evil, conniving, gold digger? Much like millions of other women then who have milked their husband for all they're worth when coming out of a messy marriage then, the gritty details of which we know nothing about. It may seem a lot but McCartney is nigh on a billionaire, and I'd wager that proportionately, the % asset split is far less than commonly seen in the divorce courts.

I don't read The Sun. All I need to know is that she's demanding money that she didn't earn, or help to earn. In that case there is NO justification for her demanding it. It is not her money to demand.

Your posts are so very confusing. One minute you're hating McCartney, then you're supporting her, then your saying it's unfair that this sort of thing happens.

Sort out the consistency of your posts - they're becoming worthy of ignoring.
 
I'm going to quote somebody from another forum that I pop in now and then who put it so eloquently and he's got it spot on :

I wonder if those of you whom so vehemently despise the woman actually KNOW why you harbour such a hatred for her? Because The Sun said she was an evil, conniving, gold digger? Much like millions of other women then who have milked their husband for all they're worth when coming out of a messy marriage then, the gritty details of which we know nothing about. It may seem a lot but McCartney is nigh on a billionaire, and I'd wager that proportionately, the % asset split is far less than commonly seen in the divorce courts.

Tbh with you, i dont need the Sun or any other tabloid to tell me that shes a gold digger. I figured that out a long time ago that shes nothing more than a gold digging whore who only married Macca for his money and nothing more.

You do realise that shes a fantastist, ego maniac and a horrid person...well maybe you dont but her ex friends, family and business associates have all said more or less the same thing about her. You dont have to go very far in the past to see proof of that ie the GMTV interview she did prove herself to be a raving lunatic...in fact her PR agent told her to shut up and dont attack the media but WTF does she do...completely ignores his advice and goes about attacking everyone and the media for their lack of privacy. The aftermath of the whole affair is that her PR agent dropped her quicker than she used to drop her knickers when she was working as a prostitute:p. She did herself absolutely no favours with that interview on GMTV...i actually watched it and was simply utterly amazed at how crazy that cow is.

I'll tell you this i hope the appeal backfires in her face - you don't announce an appeal, imply the legal profession is corrupt, attack the other barristers and then waffle about the case to the media! She's absolutely nuts. She wants privacy and things not to be made public??...well it works both ways but sadly the idiotic cow doesnt seem to get that through her thick skull. She even claimed that apart from one interview shes maintained her dignity...yeh right...liar liar peg leg on fire Heather...such a hypocritical idiot that she is.

One things for certain, she will never be liked...maybe by a few but generally from what i have been reading...people are pretty incensed about the whole thing and thats purely due to her stupid behaviour. Macca may not be liked but ill tell you this, a lot more people have more sympathy for Macca than Heather Mills...the fact he hasnt said anything since they split has gained him enormous sympathy from the public. At least hes kept his dignity...Heather??..she has absolutely no dignity, using their daughter as a pawn is about as low as you can go imho.

Now i hope the ****ing tart buggers off somewhere where i dont have to listen to her crap that keeps coming from her mouth but i really really do hope her appeal fails miserably and the judge decides to further decrease what shes entitled to...it probably wont happen but i can dream.
 
I would have married him for a tenth of that. I'd be a much cheaper prostitute.

rofl

This case really disgusts me. Although £24m is a drop in the ocean for Paul. Itjust seems wrong that she should be allowed to live well for the rest of her life just because she was married to him.

Their child should have access to his money but whos saying he's not willing to pay to support her anyway?
£35k a year in support?!?! Thats a HELL of a lot considering they should be going in joint on what they spend on their child.

She's very headstrong and mouthy. Does she not realise she's just coming accorss as a money grabbing ****?
 
rofl

This case really disgusts me. Although £24m is a drop in the ocean for Paul. Itjust seems wrong that she should be allowed to live well for the rest of her life just because she was married to him.

Their child should have access to his money but whos saying he's not willing to pay to support her anyway?
£35k a year in support?!?! Thats a HELL of a lot considering they should be going in joint on what they spend on their child.

She's very headstrong and mouthy. Does she not realise she's just coming accorss as a money grabbing ****?

She's just been given £24 million, plus whatever he paid for while they were married, plus whatever she made during the marriage by being married to him, plus whatever she was paid for selling her story, plus a huge amount of the fame she so obviously wants and would not have had if she hadn't married him and she gets their daughter...do you think she cares how she comes across?

I don't think that being married to him could possibly have been anywhere near bad enough to warrant that degree of compensation. That is what this ruling is - compensation. No-one can sanely claim that she contributed that much to his wealth. So it's either unjustified compensation or dishonest prostitution.
 
what really bugged me was how she went on about the money she would have course be giving to charity - give me a break! she didn't go to court for money for charity. she went for what she could get for herself. and she doesn't need 24million to take her of herself and her daughter.
 
Back
Top Bottom