Mondeo ST 220 / ST TDCI

One alloy has bubbled a little and apparently there is an intermittent noise from the air con which I havnt heard yet. Other than that its spot on as far as I can tell. Service history is spot on and paintwork is immaculate.

Chuffed with it. :cool:
 
[TW]Fox;11321877 said:
Electronic boot release counts as a toy??!?!

Get an ST220 for £7k and spend the change on extra petrol.

i was thinking more of the full leathers as opposed to half :(
 
The best car by a country mile is the 330D and it hasn't even got a mention :confused:

Otherwise buy the TDCI and buy a spare set of injectors, a spare mechanic to fit them and gas masks for all the people who have to breathe in the sooty emissions.
 
To me the ST220 and ST TDCi are too different to 'compare'.. the TDCI is so noticeably slow in comparison, even remapped it's not going to come close to setting the world on fire.. 180BHP in a Mondeo is not going to give much of a thrill.. ..

And where as I don't agree normally with fox on the Petrol/ Diesel debate, the fact that you can get an older ST220 then TDCi for much less cash would sway it for me as well..
 
[TW]Fox;11322166 said:
For £8-9k I wouldnt buy a 330d.

For £10k, I would.

He's unlikely to be driving intergalatic mileages (otherwise he wouldn't be considering buying a gas guzzling Mondeo V6), so he could pick up a really good condition private 80k-90k 330d for that sort of money. You tend to get quite affluent people owning these cars from new who tend to look after them. The mileage will even out over the next few years, and it will still be worth more than that Mondeo as well as being more luxurious and better to drive. Unless of course he wants a hatchback...
 
Problem is, what does a £10k 330d do which an £8.5k 330i won't?

Other than generate turbocharger failiure bills and not be as quick.
 
thing is, i want a 2004 ST220 with the 6 speed box and the revised clutch. there was quite a reliability problem with the early cluthes wasnt there ?
 
The best car by a country mile is the 330D and it hasn't even got a mention :confused:

Otherwise buy the TDCI and buy a spare set of injectors, a spare mechanic to fit them and gas masks for all the people who have to breathe in the sooty emissions.

just dont like beemers, sorry.
 
Problem with a lot of 330D's around the sub 10k mark is they have been around the moon a few times.


motorway mileage maybe but still shed loads.

This applies equally to ST TDCi's. Now, I'm not suggesting a 330d but I'd prefer a high motorway mileage car over an average typical mileage car as they'll be a load cheaper and probably in better condition.
 
thing is, i want a 2004 ST220 with the 6 speed box and the revised clutch. there was quite a reliability problem with the early cluthes wasnt there ?

Aye the earlier 5 speeder had clutch and flywheel reliability issues, you could pick up a nice 2004 for 8k if you look hard enough. Just may have to travel. It is definitely worth it thats for sure though.
 
[TW]Fox;11322330 said:
Problem is, what does a £10k 330d do which an £8.5k 330i won't?

Nothing....well, nothing apart from noticeably better fuel economy, cheaper insurance, cheaper road tax and vastly better residuals. As for turbocharger failures, you're getting confused with early 320d models. The 330d doesn't have that problem. Certainly not the later revisions that you would get for £10k.

This a great car: http://search.autotrader.co.uk/es-u...W&model=3+SERIES&min_pr=&max_pr=&max_mileage=

By that's all by the by. He wants a run of the mill souped up Ford which will depreciate like a brick, rather than German quality and precision engineering.
 
Last edited:
Nothing....well, nothing apart from noticeably better fuel economy, cheaper insurance, cheaper road tax and vastly better residuals.

The fuel economy isn't vastly better, it's circa 10mpg better in most situations. 'Vastly better residuals'? The gap will only close between them as they depreciate in value.

As for turbocharger failures, you're getting confused with early 320d models. The 330d doesn't have that problem. Certainly not the later revisions that you would get for £10k.

The 320d's have a big issue with swirlflap failiure, in addition to the regular turbo issues. I can assure you that the turbo CAN be an issue on the M57.
 
[TW]Fox;11324275 said:
The fuel economy isn't vastly better, it's circa 10mpg better in most situations. 'Vastly better residuals'? The gap will only close between them as they depreciate in value.

The gap will widen, if anything. Big capacity 6cyl E46s will plummet in value the older they get, with further pressure on residuals being brought to bear by the increased road tax. 330i about 24/25mpg in mixed conditions. 330d about 35/36mpg in mixed conditions. That's more than a 40% improvement. That's a lot.

[TW]Fox;11324275 said:
The 320d's have a big issue with swirlflap failiure, in addition to the regular turbo issues. I can assure you that the turbo CAN be an issue on the M57.

320d without a doubt, particularly early versions of that engine. 330d not a significant problem on the later revisions of that engine. If you know different, perhaps you could point to some information showing a significant proportion of 330s failing?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom