You're making a ridiculous comparison. A child is a free human being and thus more important than some old dog!Imagine having parents who watch there child, and dont let them wonder off.
kettle pot however the saying goes
edit. Imagine that dog being a pedophile and you letting him wonder off. Seriously upsets me when people dont look at the bigger picture. I would be the same be it my dog but thats only human
I could give him a good hiding![]()
Yep, keep the dog on a lead if it can't be trusted not to go and bother someone walking a dog with a lead.i doubt there's much you can do as the other guy's dog was on it's lead
I take great offence to you saying that about staffs. My next door neighbour only 2-3months ago had a LAB put down for attacking her grandchild.. OH dear lets slate labs too!
Thats a shame. I'm the opposite, not met a nasty one, they are lovely dogs.
Nearly the same, I've known one that wasn't "wagging tail" friendly but it didn't come and bother anyone, just kept itself to itself.Thats a shame. I'm the opposite, not met a nasty one, they are lovely dogs.
Hope your pup is 100% ok soon, and your mum too!
All this nonsense about it being your dogs fault, how naive are some people! If a dog on a lead in a park viciously mauls a child, is that also OK because the dog was on a lead and therefore clearly under control...?
Being on a lead and being a controlled animal are NOT the same thing.
Well if you put it like that, the owner had the dog under control, and the parent didn't have control of their child - who shouldn't have been unattended.
I think the responsibility sways more in the direction of the parent in a case like that, the dog owner had done all reasonable steps - it's not foreseeable that the dog was going to maul the child.
Hope your pup is 100% ok soon, and your mum too!
All this nonsense about it being your dogs fault, how naive are some people! If a dog on a lead in a park viciously mauls a child, is that also OK because the dog was on a lead and therefore clearly under control...?
Being on a lead and being a controlled animal are NOT the same thing.
All foreseeable steps, like making NO effort to stop the dog?
Also, the child or puppy was not unattended, it was attended, supervised, but a LARGE POWERFUL DOG had it in its mouth. Have you ever tried to loosen a LARGE POWERFUL DOGs grip on something it wants? Have you ever done so whilst being a mother, and not the body-building judo god that I'm sure you are...? Some people here are utterly ignoring half of the facts that have been stated...
How the hell can you say that? I mean cummon? The dog on a LEAD attacks a child or other dog then there too bloody close. Its on a lead for a reason. We shouldnt be pin pointing any1 dog breed here because what your saying can happen with any dog.
If my dog was to do that, attack a child I would be mortified and go down the correct channels ie termination etc god forbid.. I would ALSO press charge's on the parent for allowing there child so close to a animal and as a result both child and dog hurt/dead
I can't believe you justify a dangerous dog by saying "it was on a lead!". Clearly it is still a danger... If you need a "protection zone" around a dog because it might attack then maybe you shouldn't be taking that dog into public...