Man of Honour
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2003
- Posts
- 91,788
- Location
- Falling...
Antarctica has land beneath it so it's not that dramatic, besides if we have more water it'll mean less hosepipe bans 

Just waiting for the "oh crap melting ice does add water to the ocean" then it can all be forgotten.
I think this is really a very silly way to look at it. The percentage shouldn't matter, the fact is we're losing it. How big does it need to be before people say "oh hold on a min...now we're *******"
etc"we're all going to die"
Just waiting for the "oh crap melting ice does add water to the ocean" then it can all be forgotten.![]()
You had clear reasoning in your post, even going to the effort of using terms like "net change" and displacement.I never said it did i asked if it would raise the level![]()
So you're saying a ship is not as dense as water? Do you know what buoyancy is?
Irony, read the thread before posting.stop before you embarras yourself further
is it too late to start on my homemade underground bunker?
As a fun childrens experiemtn, put some ice-cubes in a glass with water and measure the water level, once the ice has melted measure again.
stop before you embarras yourself further.
As a fun childrens experiemtn, put some ice-cubes in a glass with water and measure the water level, once the ice has melted measure again.
Its like the whole "whats heavier, 1 ton of feathers or 1 ton of iron". Density matters not, just the dispalcment
You had clear reasoning in your post, even going to the effort of using terms like "net change" and displacement.
Like I said, one of us is big enough to admit to a retard moment. It isn't you.![]()
Arrrrggggh this topic is too complicated, I don't think I've ever been right and wrong then right again then wrong again and so on so many times in one thread before.meh turns out salt water is more dense than fresh so it will add 2.6% more than it displaced.
is it too late to start on my homemade underground bunker?
40-50 around town!![]()