It's a possibility I guess but we'd need enough salt.we could just dump huge tankers full of salt?![]()

Science has already done that for me.Prove it
It's a possibility I guess but we'd need enough salt.we could just dump huge tankers full of salt?![]()

Science has already done that for me.Prove it
It's a possibility I guess but we'd need enough salt.![]()
Ice is fresh water, sea is salt water, salt water is more dense and as such when the ice melts it raises the water level by 2.6% of its displaced volume to the water.
AS ulf said read the thread![]()
yak.h'cir said:However you said Ice was more dense then water (I presume you were referring to liquid) and not sea water.
yak.h'cir said:Melting ice will cause sea levels to rise when the ice was resting on land. Obviously when this melts and flows into the sea it will increase sea levels.
Yes but this is a thread about climate change so I am obviously talking about (fresh) arctic ice in sea water not ice cubes melting in a glass of tapwater. I didn't mention this at first because I didn't realise the difference at the time, I was just parroting documentaries.He did say that ice was more dense then water so when people pointed out this was incorrect they were right. I know he meant sea water but this is not what he said originally and I did draw attention to the difference in my post.
He's not saying that because ice bergs and ice caps etc. are not suspended above the ocean, they're in it.you're saying that a melting block of ice suspended above a pool of sea water (or water) melting would not cause the the level of the pool to rise
Stop trying to dig you way out, as you also said that a boat is more dense than water. So it's very clear what you thought.Yes but this is a thread about climate change so I am obviously talking about (fresh) arctic ice in sea water not ice cubes melting in a glass of tapwater. I didn't mention this at first because I didn't realise the difference at the time, I was just parroting documentaries.
That was purely a retard moment with buoyancy not with density. I'm not trying to dig my way out of anything and Tefal and I already covered that exact point, so as is becoming my favourite phrase today: Try reading the thread.Stop trying to dig you way out, as you also said that a boat is more dense than water. So it's very clear what you thought.
... poor Articuno![]()
Yes but this is a thread about climate change so I am obviously talking about (fresh) arctic ice in sea water not ice cubes melting in a glass of tapwater. I didn't mention this at first because I didn't realise the difference at the time, I was just parroting documentaries.
He's not saying that because ice bergs and ice caps etc. are not suspended above the ocean, they're in it.
I know, but like I said I was parroting documentaries.But when you say ice is more dense then water (liquid) because it solids are more dense then liquids you're obviously going to have people pointing out your mistake.

Not relevent to the thread since the disappearance of glaciers is well documented.To clarify further, ice that is resting on the land is not in the ocean and it's melting will have much more serious affects on sea level then that of ice already floating in the sea.
I know, but like I said I was parroting documentaries.![]()
Not relevent to the thread since the disappearance of glaciers is well documented.
There's chunks of ice as big as the Isle of Man in my freezer.

Its so straight its unreal!
There's a short movie of a flight along the 'crack' here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7313264.stm
Its so straight its unreal!
I know, and I asked why but the OcUK scientists have failed me.