To stun something/render it unconscious you must make its brain move a lot inside it's skull, a bullet doesn't really do that as it just passes through, and a lot of animals
The beauty of a bullet is that it actually stops the brain from functioning, Tefal. You see, shooting someone in the skull is more effective than clubbing them over the head. That's why our soldiers in Iraq are armed with guns instead of clubs, Tefal.
Can you see our brave soldiers triumphing over the Iraqi insurgents by running through a hail of bullets in the hope of staying alive long enough to whack them over the head with clubs? No, neither can I, Tefal.
including humans can survive a large part of their brain being torn through by a bullet, and retain conciousness.
Yes, and examples of this are rare because the chances of this happening are incredibly low, and the right conditions must be met in order for it to happen. And even when it does happen, the person/animal may be alive, but is rendered as good as dead becasue it is incapable functioning properly. It certainly cannot dive beneath the ice, slip quietly through the silky waters, and swim to safety with a merry smile on its face.
Wheras if you hold a gun to someone's head and pull the trigger, you can be guaranteed that the result will be satisfactory.
Here's a genuine offer: I propose to test your confidence in the "Well, shooting them in the head doesn't work anyway; it's much better to use a club" argument by requesting that you agree to a scientific experiment involving your head, my loaded gun, and an itchy trigger finger. After I've shot you in the head, you can take a club (provided) and attempt to stun or kill me instantly with a single blow to the skull.
How soon can we meet?
