We shouldn't worry about it - as long as we can rush to the forums in the middle of an earthquake at 3 in the morning, that's fine and dandy by me. That money is very clearly being put to good use.
Good quality business-class hosting doesn't come cheap. I can think of an awful lot of companies that spend considerably more than £25k p.a. on their systems.
To make people feel valued, etc, etc. I can't see the forums losing money for OcUK overall, meh. The forums are mutually beneficial, and that's that.
It does, I've seen the billHardware rental, bandwidth, and completely managed - it's not the cheapest but it works.
It could cost 50k and it'll still be a bargain.
Consider the hardware troubleshooting alone offer by its members, to get that run by someone who works in OCUK, to hire them 24/7 at 365, it'll mean 3 people at about 8 hours shift each, even at 20k a year salary you are saving £10k with the forum, that is before you think about the money saved on advertising, and then the extra sales the forum brings in through the recommendation of its members.
![]()
Meh beaten, But this one is better![]()
If the forums cost £50k to run, then someone is pulling a fast one with the funding for it![]()
My comment still stands with "£25k". I'm not arguing that OcUK should be spending that, or refuting they aren't spending that..No, it doesn't. 25k has been stated by Spie before but is perhaps a harsh assesment as part of our hosting is for firewalls and so on which would still cost the same if they were protecting just the shop.
It isn't cheap anyway, but it would be easy to spend a lot more.
I think the percentage of hits between ocuk's main site and the forum would definately differ if people actually bookmarked the forum instead of the main site.