EA being big-headed ? Never!

Soldato
Joined
4 Nov 2004
Posts
4,220
Location
Seattle area, USA
EA: 'We'll be gaming's greatest company'

Electronic Arts CEO John Riccitiello has said that he wants to make his company what 'Disney is to animation and NBC is to television'.

Speaking to the Financial Times (via MCV), Riccitiello said his priority wasn't being number on in the charts, but placing EA in history as videogame's all-time greatest company.

"I read a book on how every medium creates one great company: animation created Disney, CBS was created by radio, NBC by television," he said.

"Interactive entertainment is going to determine one great company and I think it's this one. One of the reasons I've come back is to try to take it to the next step."

He added: "Above all, I'm trying to bring great quality and innovation back . . . I'm also trying to drive us towards a variety of new business models, whether it be subscription or micro-transactions, or advertising-based."

We appreciate EA saying it's not all about the money, but hasn't Nintendo already gone down as 'the Disney of videogames'?

Let us hope that they continue increasing the quality of their output, and have better support and more playtesting so less bugs are in the retail product. Here's hoping! :D
 
I'm also trying to drive us towards a variety of new business models, whether it be subscription or micro-transactions, or advertising-based."

In other words, ways to repeatedly charge you for the same thing.
 
Well I'm sorry to disappoint em but Microprose was bigger imo, had the biggest inpact for me for gaming.
I don't really care about Nintendo and I aint really interested in their games.
 
EA are certinly not, and will never be the greatest company in gaming history. They have their heads too far up their arses. To EA, its al about the money. This is evident by all the advertisements in their games (think burnout) and the fact they buy rights to almost everything. Buying rights to games doesn't make you the greatest company in gaming history. Wake up call needed for Mr EA there.
 
pc gaming, maybe as a result of buying up half of the real good companies and running them into the ground.

gaming overall, never. Nintendo takes that crown
 
nintendo for consoles most definitly and hand held, but if its just pc games i think EA is pretty much up there :p
 
If every company wasn't thinking that then I'd be a bit worried for them.

Totally inappropriate thread title imo.

Fair point, but if they want to be the best, I think they should answer to the problems people have with them.

Problems people have with EA:

No new patch for battlefield 2 - not too sure of this one.
Re-charging for downloads from their store - should follow Steams' example.
Releasing games in an unfinished state - debatable but I'm sure people can list problems they've had.
Endless Sim add-on packs - :p .
Buying out and closing studios.
Giving different studios games that are not theirs. Maxis got Sim City taken off them and then the other company that did do it didn't even make it a Sim City game.

If they want to be a market leader, they have to act like one, and not own everything (all big name IPs') in order to keep their banks turning over. I wouldn't have an issue with them if they didn't suck the competition up and into their pockets.
 
Last edited:
I actually managed to download Armoured Fury using an old copy of EA Link which I grabbed from some website - just logged in and it came up as being ready for download :D

Otherwise they were asking for another £4.99 for it ... bugger that!

And there's now way I would have paid for that rubbish 'extended download service' thing either :/
 
Back
Top Bottom