Firefox is crap with vista...

marc2003 said:
to suggest using ie7 to a firefox user and vice versa is laughable. that is all. :D
Click to expand...
Fixed!

Installed FF3 the other day, all i can say is CRAP.

Literally takes more than 4x more ram and 10x longer to load. Some pages just pause for like 15 seconds, THEN decide to slowly download. And visually?... diabolical.

A bloated mess IMO.
 
asim18 said:
Fixed!

Installed FF3 the other day, all i can say is CRAP.

Literally takes more than 4x more ram and 10x longer to load. Some pages just pause for like 15 seconds, THEN decide to slowly download. And visually?... diabolical.

A bloated mess IMO.
Click to expand...

8 million users can't be wrong.
 
asim18 said:
Installed FF3 the other day, all i can say is CRAP.

Literally takes more than 4x more ram and 10x longer to load. Some pages just pause for like 15 seconds, THEN decide to slowly download. And visually?... diabolical.

A bloated mess IMO.
Click to expand...

Then there is something wrong with your install, or just your system in general.

I've used firefox and IE on several machines, ranging from an 800MHz Athlon to a Core2Duo, with various 32 bit and 64 bit Operating Systems.

And there isn't a single case where I've seen either IE or Firefox use anywhere near 4x more RAM than the other, or be 10x slower than the other. And I've certainly never seen either of them 'pause' unexpectedly, apart from on my oldest system, which isn't surprising, as most applications suffer from cpu load on such an outdated system.

From the various combinations I've tested, just in terms of speed and and response, I'd rate them in the following order:

FF3 > IE7 > FF2 > IE6...

But that being said, the differences are marginal. If you're seeing anything worse than about a second to startup, or to load a page, then you've either found a very extreme case (with a specific bug) or you've just got something else wrong with your install imo.
 
Last edited:
Firefox 3 is working perfectly for me, i like the new buttons at the top, much nicer, and its quicker...for me anyway.
 
I still prefure IE7 to firefox. IE7 is more secure and generaly faster at opening pages (especially 64bit version) firefox had its moments with fancy plugins, but ive found I can live without em. Personaly I think 8 million downloads is more for sticking the finger to microsoft rarther then it being any better as a browsing experience :) .
 
Fop said:
I suspect that your problem is vista, not FF as such. :)
Click to expand...

Doubtful, given so many other people are using the same combination without problems. It's probably just a bad Firefox installation.

MadMatty said:
Personaly I think 8 million downloads is more for sticking the finger to microsoft rarther then it being any better as a browsing experience :) .
Click to expand...

Hardly. I'm sure some people have that sort of attitude, but the vast majority are going to use and stick to Firefox purely because it's what they prefer. If IE7 was actually better, I'd be using it. Firefox and its add-ons make web browsing a far better experience though.
 
Until ie7 has pic lens it's rubbish, let alone any of the other decent add ons.
It also infuriates me, that you have to enable quick launch on ie7, they missed a trick there.
 
FF3 is excellent so far. Butt ugly with default skin, but fast and to the point. Just make sure all your addins progressed to v3 support. I found a lot stopped at v3a stage.
 
z0mbi3 said:
nah they just haven't installed ff yet ;)
Click to expand...

What, like the millions of firefox users who haven't installed opera yet ;)

See, I can make random statements too, it doesn't make them any more meaningful. FF is a reasonably good browser, it's not the second coming that some people seem to want to make it out to be. A quick look at some of the coverage of the FF3 launch proves a serious lack of substance and an awful lot of hyperbole.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom