Diablo3 !!!!!!!!!!!!

[Makunouchi]

http://eu.blizzard.com/diablo3

That gameplay video.... just came.

 

[skullman]

looks awesome

 

[NickK]

Oh my.... although the homepages don't render in Safari well.

Looks like it could be rivalling with Spore...

 

[NickK]

Was not really a fan of the assassin either but the druid seriously rocked in wolf form, so quick to attack which with a bit of life leech meant he was unstoppable

Well I loved the Assassin

Completed the game through twice with the Sourcerer and the Assassin.

The key to the assassin was quick damage. The bow and arrow rocked too

 

[Gackt]

So is this some sort of RPG?

 

[Nzyme]

So what do we know;

5 classes
- barbarian
- witch doctor
- sorcerer
- amazon
- paladin maybe ?

 

[psychas]

So what do we know;

5 classes
- barbarian
- witch doctor
- sorcerer
- amazon
- paladin maybe ?

U missed necromancer how could you

 

[Steedie]

That gameplay video was immense

 

[tdream]

Id say you are missing about 5 years lol...

You mean 8 years, twas released in 2000.

 

[NickK]

Ahh the webpages work but you have to give them time to load... a lot of time!

The witchdoctor seems to have replaced the Necro. Which as ok but suffered if there wasn't any bodies lying around (ie end mob)

Runs off to find his Diablo discs and the Leopard native installer...

 

[utajoker]

ITS ABOUT TIME

EXCITED

 

[Strife212]

U missed necromancer how could you

Necro is gone for sure, theres only 5 classes and its too similar to witch doctor

 

[tdream]

Lots of info over at http://www.mmo-champion.com/

 

[lewism]

havent played the diablo series before but im seriously excited over this.

 

[Teaf]

Whilst I'm really really really really really really really really looking forward to this game, I'm kinda disappointed it's not an MMO or doesn't look like it'll be much of a multiplayer game. That said, I'm still dying to play it for the single player

 

[Strife212]

No, no, no, Diablo II was TERRIBLE in single player compared to online, trust me it's a lot more of a multiplayer game than it looks there. You can create your own game online and just play by yourself if you want, however you always have the option of playing / trading with others.

Wheras if you start a Single Player character you are stuck like that.

 

[Warbie]

I now have a reason to upgrade

 

[tdream]

No, no, no, Diablo II was TERRIBLE in single player compared to online, trust me it's a lot more of a multiplayer game than it looks there. You can create your own game online and just play by yourself if you want, however you always have the option of playing / trading with others.

Wheras if you start a Single Player character you are stuck like that.

It wasn't terrible for sure. I've only ever played single player and that was so many hours of fun. Probably the best (read addictive) single player ever. Looking forward to multiplayer D3 though

 

[Strife212]

Compared to online it was though, because it was exactly the same but you could trade with others and group up, as well as play Solo in a passworded game

 

[Teaf]

No, no, no, Diablo II was TERRIBLE in single player compared to online, trust me it's a lot more of a multiplayer game than it looks there. You can create your own game online and just play by yourself if you want, however you always have the option of playing / trading with others.

Wheras if you start a Single Player character you are stuck like that.

I guess it depends how it works in multiplayer if it is more multiplayer than single player. What I didn't like on Diablo 2 was you could make your own servers, I'd rather have just dedicated servers that players can join but that would basically mean MMO status, and I'm not sure if the game could work like that but it's really hard to judge from 1 gameplay video

I hope it's multiplayer more than single player, and hope that is an enthralling multiplayer experience.