Teki, no offence but you're full of it. In before ad hominem.
This is what you sound like to me, especially in #173: -
![]()
You can post funny pictures and insult people. Bet your a great laugh at parties.
Teki, no offence but you're full of it. In before ad hominem.
This is what you sound like to me, especially in #173: -
![]()
OMGz that's by PBS, you're being brainwashed.*sigh* watch this, then once you've watched it, watch it again also do you have any credible sources of what your implying?

I'm alright at parties actually, but I'd get more laughs if I said the **** you're coming out with.You can post funny pictures and insult people. Bet your a great laugh at parties.
*sigh* watch this, then once you've watched it, watch it again also do you have any credible sources of what your implying?
I'm alright at parties actually, but I'd get more laughs if I said the **** you're coming out with.
Strange that they recovered a large amount of Gold then. Any reason why it wouldn't all be taken? Any reason why someone would be stupid enough to think hundreds of millions of dollars going missing wouldn't bring a whole lot of attention?The part about the missing gold is true. Quite a lot of coverage you can find with google.
erm it explains how the building collapsed by the means of a fire from a jet liner crashing into it.
Oh come on, you have to admit that's a great pic.You can post funny pictures and insult people. Bet your a great laugh at parties.

Strange that they recovered a large amount of Gold then. Any reason why it wouldn't all be taken? Any reason why someone would be stupid enough to think hundreds of millions of dollars going missing wouldn't bring a whole lot of attention?
But my post was about the recording from the fire fighters radios who where inside the building saying the fire was out.
How does that video have anything to do with that?
Oh come on, you have to admit that's a great pic.![]()
Where are these recordings I've never heard them? show me a source/references.
Also how can you possibly say that there was not a fire in the building, there are hundreds of video clips/pictures showing it!
Hope? Are you joking? I'd love one of these conspiracy theories to be true just once. That doesn't mean I'm going to be blinded by my desire to see it come true though.You have 4 billion in gold, you take 1 billion, say it was lost in the destruction.....just a theory.
Again you seem to cling onto this hope that what you are told on the news is exactly what is going on.
There are a lot of credible independent news sources who provide the whole story, rather then the watered down version.
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/wtcaudio/
yeah from there, and what you've just posted actually shows the firefighters saying there are fires..?!
Hope? Are you joking? I'd love one of these conspiracy theories to be true just once. That doesn't mean I'm going to be blinded by my desire to see it come true though.
Searching for anything that supports your ideas is not the same as searching for the truth. You have to judge what is reliable info and what is not, conspiracy theorists have a habit of giving for too much attention to very unreliable information (while at the same time completely ignoring any evidence otherwise, no matter how strong).
That could be 2 isolated pockets of fire in that room, that floor, within their immediate vision (unless they had x-ray vision and could assess the whole building from one floor).God, its like spoon feeding a child.
Battalion Seven Chief: "Battalion Seven ... Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines.
2 isolated fires which can be put out.
Pretty sure 2 isolated fires cant bring down a tower.
That could be 2 isolated pockets of fire in that room, that floor, within their immediate vision (unless they had x-ray vision and could assess the whole building from one floor).
This is what I mean, it's a huge stretch to take that quote and assume it means 2 isolated pockets of fire in the entire building.
But isn't it a huge stretch to say the opposite?