Conspiracy Files: The Third Tower

These 'conspiracy theorists' do my nut in, they are based on dubious 'proof'.
Films of confused firefighters at the scene saying something like "Woah that was a big bang, sounded like a bomb" is apparently indisputable evidence.

They apparently think that the US government did this on purpose? Why? I'm sure they have better things to do than kill 3000 of their people, destroy one of their most recognisable buildings and destabilise their economy.

They clutch at straws, saying how the BBC incorrectly reported that one of the towers had collapsed, this is apparently evidence somehow. When the BBC explained the mistake and the director of the 'loose change' film was told about it his reaction was 'I don't ******* care' (apparently they're all part of 'the system' (he actually said that)).

They say they can tell the building was blown up 'because it looked like it fell funny', I mean how many buildings have these people seen where it fell because a plane flew into it.

Also apparently the pentagon was hit by a missile, however no attempt is made to explain what happened to the plane that allegedly hit it, or its passengers.

I have not seen any solid evidence, peer reviewed journals, or trustworthy witness reports that back up their statements, only blurry videos, and pictures with a few pixels circled apparently showing a bomb or something. I'd be surprised if any of these people had gone any further than YouTube for their research.
 
badbob said:
I doubt they don't have procedures in place, granted they wouldn't know what the outcome of that plane will be, but they know it's hijacked but Muslim so either kidnapping or suicide.
Click to expand...
It has never happened before, procedures 99.9% of the time come from previous events and errors.
at the worst it would have been a bomb on the plane, they would not of shot it down over a populated area.
 
Hamish said:
They clutch at straws, saying how the BBC incorrectly reported that one of the towers had collapsed, this is apparently evidence somehow. When the BBC explained the mistake and the director of the 'loose change' film was told about it his reaction was 'I don't ******* care' (apparently they're all part of 'the system' (he actually said that)).
Click to expand...

That bit was actually about someone in the US goverment, can't rememeber who it was now.

But he did believe the BBC error was a mistake, and didn't want it included in the film, but he wasn't the only person making the film so it ended up getting in.
 
And I disagree they don't have procedures for it "just because it didn't happen before" this is the most powerful country in the world, with a goverment with the resources at it's hand, and not one agency could think up of a instance like this? bull.
 
badbob said:
And I disagree they don't have procedures for it "just because it didn't happen before" this is the most powerful country in the world, with a goverment with the resources at it's hand, and not one agency could think up of a instance like this? bull.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter what you belief unless you have some shred of evidence.

That is what the report said, we can couple that with human error and the fact that this has never happened before.

Just more CT speculation with nothing to even remotely support it.
 
It doesn't matter what you belief unless you have some shred of evidence.
Click to expand...

lol. Do you really think goverments will hand out protocols for any and every situation if the public requests? No way they're classified. Write to your MP & army base what the procedures are for a biological attack in the UK.

Nothing about CT :rolleyes:

And I just proved it, there has been no biological attack in the UK, so by your logic the armed services, goverment and police have no procedures down on what to do. massive rolleyes..
 
Last edited:
badbob said:
lol. Do you really think goverments will hand out protocols for any and every situation if the public requests? No way they're classified. Write to your MP & army base what the procedures are for a biological attack in the UK.

Nothing about CT :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


yes it's as CT, a theory which go against numrouse reports and offer nbo refuting evidence and come up with claims it can't get hold of the nessecery data. That is exactly what a CT is
 
badbob said:
lol. Do you really think goverments will hand out protocols for any and every situation if the public requests? No way they're classified. Write to your MP & army base what the procedures are for a biological attack in the UK.

Nothing about CT :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

But they'll tell you they do have a procedure in place.
 
badbob said:
And I disagree they don't have procedures for it "just because it didn't happen before" this is the most powerful country in the world, with a goverment with the resources at it's hand, and not one agency could think up of a instance like this? bull.
Click to expand...

Remember the world before 9/11? Getting an internal flight was like getting on a bus, terrorism was unknown, the US was safe. You're a top general. Suddenly you hear a plane has been hijacked and is not responding.

Bear in mind most hijackings divert the plane somewhere, land then demand money etc. I don't think anything remotely similar had ever happened before.

Would YOU take the initiative to shoot down the plane, risking being responsible for killing hundreds of innocent civilians?
 
mr.sly said:
But they'll tell you they do have a procedure in place.
Click to expand...

Muslims hijacking planes is common. And so is killing themselves taking innocents with them.

It won't take a group of people in a room to figure the next logical step and take precautions. Or do national security agencies just play computer games all day? :rolleyes:
 
badbob said:
Muslims hijacking planes is common. And so is killing themselves taking innocents with them.

It won't take a group of people in a room to figure the next logical step and take precautions. Or do national security agencies just play computer games all day? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

See above. :)
 
badbob said:
Muslims hijacking planes is common. And so is killing themselves taking innocents with them.

It won't take a group of people in a room to figure the next logical step and take precautions. Or do national security agencies just play computer games all day? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
so why where internal flights at the time barley screened. Someone must have thought about that :rolleyes:. Think will you, it wasn't thought of and since then security on internal flights has increased and new procedures brought in.
 
badbob said:
Muslims hijacking planes is common. And so is killing themselves taking innocents with them.

It won't take a group of people in a room to figure the next logical step and take precautions. Or do national security agencies just play computer games all day? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Common? How many times a day does this happen?
 
Common? How many times a day does this happen?
Click to expand...

Irrelevent. A goverment such as the US will have a procedure for this situation. One labelled "what to do if a nasty band of Muslims hijack a plane" Or are you saying CIA, MI5 and the other agencies don't do a damn thing?

I can't believe the stupitidy here. :-/
 
badbob said:
Irrelevent. A goverment such as the US will have a procedure for this situation. One labelled "what to do if a nasty band of Muslims hijack a plane" Or are you saying CIA, MI5 and the other agencies don't do a damn thing?
Click to expand...

Of course they do. But as Hamish already said, every other terroist had landed at an airport and demanded money/people to be set free. Not crashed into skyscrapers.

badbob said:
I can't believe the stupitidy here. :-/
Click to expand...

Neither can I.
 
badbob said:
Irrelevent. A goverment such as the US will have a procedure for this situation. One labelled "what to do if a nasty band of Muslims hijack a plane" Or are you saying CIA, MI5 and the other agencies don't do a damn thing?

I can't believe the stupitidy here. :-/
Click to expand...


If they had thought of this. Internal flights would have been much more secure. But I see you keep ignoring this point.

Yes they have procedures, but they didn't have one for this particular event and even then. people didn't know the procedure well enough to follow the closest one.
 
AcidHell2 said:
It has never happened before, procedures 99.9% of the time come from previous events and errors.
at the worst it would have been a bomb on the plane, they would not of shot it down over a populated area.
Click to expand...

The single most heavily fortified country in the world, protective of EVERYTHING and EVERYONE, don't have a procedure to stop a hijacked plane and amazingly failed to stop them on the one occasion that it turned out to be a massive terrorist attack?? They certainly would shoot it down over a populated area if they were in no fly zones, or thought they were heading towards the Pentagon, Whitehouse or the towers.


AcidHell2 said:
It doesn't matter what you belief unless you have some shred of evidence.

That is what the report said, we can couple that with human error and the fact that this has never happened before.

Just more CT speculation with nothing to even remotely support it.
Click to expand...

And exactly what 'evidence' do you have that allows you to discount someone else having a different view? You've been fed by the media and gobbled it all up; probably THE least reliable source when it comes to things of this magnitude. They can spin any which way they want to, and usually do.

I think you just like to play devil's advocate in threads like these, I remember you from past threads. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom