-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Q6600 users what's your vid
- Thread starter cleric
- Start date
1.168v while doing some encoding.
Ok, no more showing off now.
mines lower 1.1625
did a post here a while back with screenshot but i can't be bothered to look 
mines lower 1.1625
*sniffle*
1.168v while doing some encoding.
Ok, no more showing off now.
That's not your VID, run up coretemp to show the VID.
Got to say WOW, it's even lower then what you originally posted.
Indeed I would love to get my hands on that one and have a play
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2004
- Posts
- 20,802
- Location
- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Isn't 1.2 the minimum?
If that VID is real.
I have to use 1.46vcore (windows) for 3.6GHZ, crappy 1.3125 VID
1.46v for 3.6ghz isn't too terrible.......
But for a lapped cpu and a s1283 heatsink 72c under prime is bad.... and there is a 8-9c difference between cores. However it's better than it was before it was lapped (Cheers W3bbo and yes it's properly fitted 
)
(Cheers W3bbo and yes it's properly fitted )
Last edited:
I have to use 1.46vcore (windows) for 3.6GHZ, crappy 1.3125 VID
It is pretty good that. I need 1.45v windows and 1.41v load to get my 1.25vid stable at 3.6Ghz.
So yours is a pretty good overclocker. Shame about the core temp differences though and your lack of adequate cooling.
