because over DVI you can only punt 60hz @ 1920x1200.
DisplayPort may improve this, but it's not ony many monitors or cards.
because over DVI you can only punt 60hz @ 1920x1200.
DisplayPort may improve this, but it's not ony many monitors or cards.
You don't output a 120Hz signal, the display brings it up to 120Hz.
This is just what I've read from people who have attended trade shows where the 120Hz screens have been demonstrated, but apparently, although it's still a 60 Hz signal, the effect of the extra interpolated in-between frames is to reduce ghosting/blurring significantly.So "brining it up" to 120hz wouldn't actually do anything, especially if the signal was already only at 60hz (what are you going to do, play every frame twice to get 120hz?!?).
This is just what I've read from people who have attended trade shows where the 120Hz screens have been demonstrated, but apparently, although it's still a 60 Hz signal, the effect of the extra interpolated in-between frames is to reduce ghosting/blurring significantly.
What's the point then? LCD's don't behave the same way CRT's do (which is why we saw > 100 hz refresh rates on some telly's). With a CRT the phosphor starts fading before the next beam strike, leading to flickering that could be irritating and/or headache inducing to some.
With an LCD each pixel is persistent, displaying the same colour until changed, no turning off, no flickering etc.
So "brining it up" to 120hz wouldn't actually do anything, especially if the signal was already only at 60hz (what are you going to do, play every frame twice to get 120hz?!?).