Eating after the gym?

Associate
Joined
9 Dec 2007
Posts
2,408
I've been going to the gym 2-3 times a week for about 4 months now, and eating very healthily and am careful in the amount I eat etc. However, I have been seeing next to no differences. I am stronger, but appear to have lost none of my lovable puppy fat and weigh exactly the same.

I got informed today that eating immediately after exercise, the gym in my case, is a bad idea. Is this the case? If so, how bad is it?

I have lunch straight after the gym every time I go, and lunch is normally the biggest meal in my day. Could this be why I am seeing no real gains?
 
I eat about 45mins after leaving the gym and definitely losing weight. Ask one of the gym instructors for some advice about diet and if you don't already, sort an exercise reigeme out.
 
What type of stuff are you doing in the gym? You want to be doing cardio to lose weight, no good just doing weights.
 
I was originally doing 45 mins of cardio and about the same again of weights. However, I find cardio wrist slittingly boring so I reduced the time down to 30 minutes as I was just dreading going, finding it a drag etc. which in turn would have just been less productive. I now do 10 minutes on the x-trainer, then some weights, then a 10 minute job, then some weights, finish with a 10 minute cycle.
 
You might have a better response if you'd have put this in the sports section.

The whole eating thing becomes a bit more complex depending on what it is you are trying to acheive from the gym? If you are stronger then you might have gained more muscle weight. As Slackworth has already stated 45 -60 minutes after a workout seems fine to me. I generally take a high protein shake within completing a workout etc.
 
Last edited:
It depends on what sort of exercise you are doing + what sort of food you are eating after workout.

Plus you got to tell us what goal are you trying to achieve? Are you going for fatloss? Bulk up? It'll vary hugely depend on the goal you are trying to achieve.

Typically the recommended is that you take carbs + protein one hour before workout and protein immediately after workout. If it's one of your cardio day, don't eat for an hour after cardio workout.

Basicly try and calculate your Basal Metabolic Rate + record your daily calorie intake then change your workout plan.
 
Sorry, I didn't actually realise there was a sports section. Will post there next time, or if a Mod could move it..

Either way, I am going for pure fat loss. I have been trying to cut out fat and carbs from my diet almost entirely, I also don't eat a great deal of protein. The problem is every single book, website or article I read seems to give me conflicting information as to what is best.
 
Sorry, I didn't actually realise there was a sports section. Will post there next time, or if a Mod could move it..

Either way, I am going for pure fat loss. I have been trying to cut out fat and carbs from my diet almost entirely, I also don't eat a great deal of protein. The problem is every single book, website or article I read seems to give me conflicting information as to what is best.

you'll need to be quite in depth about your routine, height, weight etc :)
 
Sorry, I didn't actually realise there was a sports section. Will post there next time, or if a Mod could move it..

Either way, I am going for pure fat loss. I have been trying to cut out fat and carbs from my diet almost entirely, I also don't eat a great deal of protein. The problem is every single book, website or article I read seems to give me conflicting information as to what is best.

I am doing the same as you at the moment, basically I have cut all the rubbish out of my "diet" I am just eating healthily and taking regular exercise.

At the end of this month I would have been going the gym for 2 months and as of this week I have lost 2.5 stone, hopefully by the end of the month I will hit the 3 stone mark!!!

The plan I have had devised for me is cardio, weight and finish with more cardio at the end of the session. The reasoning behind this according to the instructor is that the 20 minutes of cardio uses up my energy reserves, the weights burn the fat to convert it to energy and then the cardio at the end tops me up so to speak, he did explain it more technically then this but I hope that makes sense.
 
IMO you shouldn't worry too much about food - as long as you're eating a balanced diet and aren't scoffing junk food regularly then tbh.. the counting calories stuff is for girls - best way to lose weight is regular exercise

You might not see results straight away but should do over time - perhaps you aren't pushing yourself hard enough - if you've not exercised regularly before it might be worth booking a class or session with a personal trainer just so you get pushed a bit further and know what you can achieve then try to aim for a harder workout when training by yourself.
 
Could you be replacing the fat with muscle and as muscle weights more the fact you're loosing fat and staying the same weight makes sense?

Yagetmeh?
 
What type of stuff are you doing in the gym? You want to be doing cardio to lose weight, no good just doing weights.

I disagree with that. I didn't do any cardio, just weights. When I started going to the gym I was about 11.5 stone, and I'm now 9.5 stone. This was only over the space of a few months.

I'd fully recommend weights only for losing weight. Helps retain muscle as opposed to doing cardio for weight loss.
 
I've heard that when you just start getting into shape by going to the gym and stuff to lose weight then you're better off using a mirror to monitor the change than using scales becuase of muscle being denser than fat. However, I'm no expert, just thought I'd stick my oar in.
 
I've heard that when you just start getting into shape by going to the gym and stuff to lose weight then you're better off using a mirror to monitor the change than using scales becuase of muscle being denser than fat. However, I'm no expert, just thought I'd stick my oar in.

Scales aren't really necessary at any point. The mirror is the best way to measure progress, although body fat measurements are nice for quantitative evidence of progress. :)
 
I disagree with that. I didn't do any cardio, just weights. When I started going to the gym I was about 11.5 stone, and I'm now 9.5 stone. This was only over the space of a few months.

I'd fully recommend weights only for losing weight. Helps retain muscle as opposed to doing cardio for weight loss.
To lose weight best its actually best to do a combination, if you do cardio then weights you burn a lot more weight. Also look up HIIT training (High intensity interval training IIRC) its supposed to burn fat 8x faster.
 
I had a friend who did this sort of thing (a type of HIIT) for a whole summer and lost an amazing amount of weight - said it felt like he was going to die after it for the first month though.

You also need to eat decent food to a certain extent though.
 
To lose weight best its actually best to do a combination, if you do cardio then weights you burn a lot more weight. Also look up HIIT training (High intensity interval training IIRC) its supposed to burn fat 8x faster.

I'm not disagreeing that cardio and HIIT will make you lose weight, but the slow pace 45 minute cardio just takes up too much time, and it's pretty boring. HIIT is good, but it leaves you exhausted (I only did it a few times, and stopped because I really hated it).

I used to do cardio for 1 hour (inc. warm up/down) and burn 850 calories each time (back when I went 5x a week), and I did lose weight quickly, but when I transitioned from that to weights, I lost roughly the same amount of weight, but in half an hour (inc. warm up/down) instead of 1 hour, and I could see small gains in the amount of weight I could lift, which was an added bonus.

For the average Joe, they don't really care about fitness as long as they aren't fat and look good naked. If you have sporting aims, yeah, it would be a lot better, but it would also take up more time.

If you have the time to spare, do a combination by all means, but if you just want to look good naked with minimal time spent - kind of like a midpoint between time spent and results - I'd go weights only.
 
I disagree with that. I didn't do any cardio, just weights. When I started going to the gym I was about 11.5 stone, and I'm now 9.5 stone. This was only over the space of a few months.

I'd fully recommend weights only for losing weight. Helps retain muscle as opposed to doing cardio for weight loss.

9.5 stone??! Good god man, how tall are you? I'd love to be just 11.5 stone!
 
To lose weight best its actually best to do a combination, if you do cardio then weights you burn a lot more weight. Also look up HIIT training (High intensity interval training IIRC) its supposed to burn fat 8x faster.

Always told to do weights before cardio.
 
Weights before cardio because in general weight lifting will be done much better on carbs, use them up and get you into the fat burning zone for your cardio.

However, people used to go and spend 3 hours doing silly weights in the gym, now people do 40mins to an hour because , by differing amounts in different people testosterone levels drops quite significantly after say on average 45 minutes.. lots of people keep weights toa minimum 30-45mins 2-3 times a week working on specific body parts only so you only do each muscle group once a week giving them time to build properly, then do cardio on different days, or just a completely different time, so isolating the two types of exercise from each other.

To the OP specifically, mirror work isn't always the best method, a tape measure can help, a combo of a bunch of things can help you see how your body is changing. Stomach/moobs/bum are often things on men that will be last to decrease in size, upper arms, thighs, neck, wrist/ankle are the things that are likely to be reducing in size first and the changes can be slight enough to not see in a mirror. Not seeing the stomach/moobs reducing in size(though judging by your weight they aren't likely to be big anyway) can kill motivation, but knowing you're losing inch's elsewhere can help.

cardio/weights/cardio/weights/cardio/weights spreading the weights out isn't great for the weights part of it, though if you're not looking to bulk up much its not the worst thing for you. The other problem is beginner gains in muscle building. If you've gone from almost no exercise to some, you'll find you can put on muscle pretty ridiculously easily and this can certainly account for lack of weight loss, though hopefully the thighs, biceps, ankles, wrist and neck will still lose inches to let you know weight hasn't changed but body shape has.

Cardio essentially burns calories on the spot, not that many tbh, the amount you burn in one hour of cardio is nothing compared to the 23 hours you aren't working out so thats the key, getting metabolism up during those 23 other hours. Weight training pumps metabolism up for the other 23 hours, and infact for more than that, Type 2 muscle is the muscle you want to be building/using for real metabolic increase which in turn helps you burn a lot more energy throughout the day which is why weights are actually better for losing weight than cardio. In general a good mix isn't half bad because cardio, and increasing your endurance and stamina burns some calories but makes you better able to do sustained form keeping weight workouts.

Eating after the gym is a subject with many opinions and depends completely on what you are doing. If you just did cardio, eating straight away, not at a normally schedualled meal is really counterproductive, cardio for the sake of burning calories is silly if you just go and eat those calories right back.

A protein shake/based meal from 10minutes to an hour after doing weights is supposed to be very useful for kick starting the rebuilding process and as building that type 2 muscle is what will help you burn more calories, and your body will use energy to build that muscle aswell as protein, its something you should be doing.


Last question to OP would be, what do you have for that lunch. THe optimum setup for weight loss is to not have a main meal or a large meal, just literally as many small meals as physically possible for you spread equally throughout the day with similar calories in each adding up to a slight calorie deficit for you.

Either way, diet is the key here, not exercise, weights, cardio are a very small part of losing weight, its 80-90% about how and what you eat.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom