9/11 An Inside Job?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Associate
Joined
28 Jun 2008
Posts
267
World Trade Center Controlled Demolition Anyone?

Pentagon Damage inconsistant with a Boeing 757.

World Trade Center 7 Completely Untouched, Yet it still fell.

No steel frame buildings had ever before in history collapsed either from fires or planes hitting them. They are designed to withstand those hazards. On 9/11 three of them fell, and fell perfectly straight down. Why do you think demolition experts spend weeks planting charges and timing the explosions with millisecond precision? To make sure the buildings implode and fall straight down, just as the three WTC towers did. That perfection does not happen by accident. Further, the timing of the falls are indicative of linear controlled demolitions, not accelerating natural gravitational collapse. An engineering failure of this magnitude would normally demand an exhaustive study as to the mechanism of failure to ensure it never happened again, but all the evidence was quickly whisked away and melted down thus ensuring the cause was never discovered.


The 1/3 sized wheels, turbofan and diffuser found at the Pentagon crash are not part of a 757, but of a much smaller military aircraft the A-3 drone. Two civilian defense contractor employees — told to remain silent — say other workers quietly retro-fitted missile and remote control systems onto A-3 jets at Colorado public airport prior to September 11. Bush claims a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon then vaporised, and that is why there was no wreckage, but that is utterly impossible. The titanium used in the 12 tons of engines does not even melt at temperatures reached by mixing jet fuel and pure oxygen much less vaporise. Think about it. Titanium was chosen for the engines because it would not even weaken when subjected to an optimum mixture of jet fuel and air for hours on end during ordinary flight. Further, there were not even broken windows where the engines purportedly hit the Pentagon. And to top it off, photos show no sign of a fuel fire like the ones hitting the two towers. So, according to Bush, not only did the most of the plane vanish, a mysterious shrinking ray made the wheels and turbofans shrink to 1/3 the normal diameter and change into a type used by A-3 military drones


There just some facts!

Please Share your opinions.
 
As long as it has to.... Look at the facts. do some research, then after all that decide for yourself.

well since lately i do have a lot of free time i actually did read up on it, and i came to the conclusion that there really isnt any conspiracy, ok maybe the government afterwards did cover their backsides but it was to be expected tbh
 
But how do you explain the pentagon and the towers collapsing. pluss there was not arabs onboard flight 77 (Not Pointing the finger) just a fact.


^^ i need sleep. my spelling is terrible

also have you watched Loose Change 2nd Edition?
 
But how do you explain the pentagon and the towers collapsing. pluss there was not arabs onboard flight 77 (Not Pointing the finger) just a fact.

?

the towers collapsed because the fire proof coating was brittle and steel losses half its' structural strength at something like 600 C . along with the fact that the WTC was uiqe in it;s archetecture as it was designed to fall in on itself, you know what **** it read the other thread.

Also how do yo thik ypou can keep 100 + people silent? :/
 
Most if not all the fuel was burnt up on impact. no fual you have no excellent, and no "hot" fires. the building was over designed to take a direct hit of a boeing 727, and a 250year storm. the tempreture was about 1,500c. and the steel used was tested for 7 hours at 7,000c without melting or loosing its streath qualities.
 
No steel frame buildings had ever before in history collapsed either from fires or planes hitting them. They are designed to withstand those hazards.

*citation needed.

Just because you write a sentence down does not mean you can claim it to be fact.

Further, the timing of the falls are indicative of linear controlled demolitions, not accelerating natural gravitational collapse.

*citation needed.

Just because you write a sentence down does not mean you can claim it to be fact.

An engineering failure of this magnitude would normally demand an exhaustive study as to the mechanism of failure to ensure it never happened again, but all the evidence was quickly whisked away and melted down thus ensuring the cause was never discovered.

*citation needed.

Just because you write a sentence down does not mean you can claim it to be fact.

The 1/3 sized wheels, turbofan and diffuser found at the Pentagon crash are not part of a 757, but of a much smaller military aircraft the A-3 drone. Two civilian defense contractor employees — told to remain silent — say other workers quietly retro-fitted missile and remote control systems onto A-3 jets at Colorado public airport prior to September 11.

*citation needed.

Just because you write a sentence down does not mean you can claim it to be fact.

Bush claims a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon then vaporised, and that is why there was no wreckage, but that is utterly impossible. The titanium used in the 12 tons of engines does not even melt at temperatures reached by mixing jet fuel and pure oxygen much less vaporise. Think about it. Titanium was chosen for the engines because it would not even weaken when subjected to an optimum mixture of jet fuel and air for hours on end during ordinary flight.

*citation needed.

Just because you write a sentence down does not mean you can claim it to be fact.

And to top it off, photos show no sign of a fuel fire like the ones hitting the two towers. So, according to Bush, not only did the most of the plane vanish, a mysterious shrinking ray made the wheels and turbofans shrink to 1/3 the normal diameter and change into a type used by A-3 military drones

*citation needed.

Just because you write a sentence down does not mean you can claim it to be fact.
 
*citation needed.

Just because you write a sentence down does not mean you can claim it to be fact.



*citation needed.

Just because you write a sentence down does not mean you can claim it to be fact.



*citation needed.

Just because you write a sentence down does not mean you can claim it to be fact.



*citation needed.

Just because you write a sentence down does not mean you can claim it to be fact.



*citation needed.

Just because you write a sentence down does not mean you can claim it to be fact.



*citation needed.

Just because you write a sentence down does not mean you can claim it to be fact.


Those are True Facts...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom