This one... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJyuQVIFdKo
Events witnessed over 2-3 nights by between 10-20 airforce personnel including the deputy base commander, recorded on casette tape, dangerously high geiger counter readings, sworn testimonies, indentations on ground, radar supportive evidence from local airport, police and locals
Theres a lot of crap too, hoaxes and easily explained events but Rendlesham and Walton make intriguing reads
That one is from STS-80, the exact mission I mentioned that launched satellites to follow the shuttle in formation.
That one is from STS-80, the exact mission I mentioned that launched satellites to follow the shuttle in formation.
In all seriousness, Im amazed at how people can be so dismissive and unwilling to accept that their might be intelligence a MILLION years ahead of us quite easily.
Then thats strange, satellites appearing out of no where, random other craft in the background, i think not!
Look! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OEY0s2uYX4
If you look at the light you'll see that the sun has just shone on the objects which is why they appear to light up. It also just took we about 30seconds to find the more a much more convincing explanation with the portion of video.
According to an astronaut called Storey Musgrave the objects in that part of the video are just light reflecting off the pieces from the support structure which was blown off when the explosive bolts were fired to separate the payload. The clips you see posted by the ufo nuts have been cut to remove the explosion and edited so that you only see the debris. Interestingly it seems Storey Musgrave is a supporter of the alien/ufo theories but has come out to debunk that particular video.
No one of any scientifc worth has ever stated that the probability of an ET visiting Earth is high, quite the oposite. What several prominant scientists have said (E.g., Frank Drake), that the probability of intelligent ET life is quite high, given the assumptions made in their equations. .
So yes I think there is a massive chance ET exists (maths works this out as a greater than 99% probability)
As for visiting earth who knows, but there out there somewhere
Sounds very convenient, i would like to see this full video?
I know some videos could be optical effects and other things but then some stuff just can't be so easily dismissed, theres quite a few good nasa videos that can't and this is one of them.
It's hardly a leap of faith the say the objects in the video could be junk from the shuttle, there's an awful lot of it up there! Just because it doesn't fit in with aliens doesn't mean it's a cover up.
If that's one of the better UFO videos I'm even less convinced that they're visiting us.
More info from Story Musgrave:
"Objects in space, particularly near-foreground objects, do weird things, he said. They are ubiquitous. They break apart. They move independently. They bump into each other and make right- angle maneuvers. They change velocity."
Now thats unbelievable, simple physics shows an object in motion stays in motion, any close foreground objects would move out of frame in a short time and will never randomly change direction, also being in space the chances of bumping are slim with objects let along small objects, also we don't see bumping of objects, as for the sun lighting up things all of a sudden, whats blocking the light exactly for individual objects?
Good ufo videos show advanced flying capabilities, check out these plane followers...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNWa7PZoTTg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TnyDw8qfjk
They're certainly intriguing reads! I was linked up with the Rendlesham story yesterday and it caught my attention!
It certainly sounded a lot like a coverup of something, I say more likely they're covering up some kind of weapon or plane though not aliens but I doubt we'll ever know for sure either way. Just one point about the radiation though, it wasn't 'dangerously high' it was only slightly above the expected background levels and seeing as though it was next to an American military base isn't really a shocker. Including exaggerated details like this only serves to make people think the rest of the details are probably exaggerated as well.
If the stories are true then theres been millions of sightings but not one shred of evidence - go figure.
Notice the bit where it mentions breaking apart and collisions, these are known to alter the motion of objects.
Apparently it's the Earth that s blocking the light, also individual objects will having different surfaces so will reflect light it amounts.
Just had a look at those videos and whilst i'm happy to admit I don't have an explanation for them this second I certainly wouldn't classify that movement as 'advanced flying capabilities'.
Obviously we disagree, two people can look at evidence and come to separate conclusions based on what they know, i also think by now you're nit picking for the sake of it, you could hand someone a HD video of a person being abducted and taken on a tour of the ship and they wouldn't even entertain the idea its real.
UFO's have disabled nuclear missiles in the past, watch this video which was on recently about it, it's quite entertaining when they bring on the sceptic, his argument is weak and tries to ignore the fact something happened or that the phenomena exists.
UFO Debate Larry King CNN 1 of 4
UFO Debate Larry King CNN 2 of 4
UFO Debate Larry King CNN 3 of 4
UFO Debate Larry King CNN 4 of 4