They see me rollin' (in a now-barginous, '90s luxobarge style)

I really like the paint job on the first one but the wheels are a bit meh. Second one is cool though. Much prefer the Passat from the other day though if I'm honest.
 
Me likey, especially the first one :cool:

And LOL @ the 'Chav' comments, whatever you think of these cars, they are anything but 'Chav'....
 
Not sure on the stance of either of those cars really but trés bon, especially the paintjob on the first.
 
[TW]Fox;12289097 said:
No, they are available in various different engine sizes - from 2.0 and upwards.
Click to expand...

Are you sure?
I thought the smallest engine they ever put in the A8 was the 2.8 and the largest the 6.0 W12 (Germany only for that shape).
 
Love the matt black, colour of choice for me, but as said before wheels on the first one are a bit meh. Would love to see if matt black rims would work that have some chrome on the lip exposed.

Still don't get this fascination with major camber, pointless and silly in my eyes, but it looks funky :D

PENSKI: Will be getting some pics of my old red audi up this weekend, going mental on the cleaning this weekend. The last pics (left at home :/) looked awesome with only a quick clean.

Any shops that I can pick some of this collonite or special wax up from, forgot to order any online. Have a halfrauds, carnoiser, and a few other car bits shops around the parents house ?
 
Last edited:
[TW]Fox;12289097 said:
No, they are available in various different engine sizes - from 2.0 and upwards.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure the absolute smallest was the 2.8, which was still somewhat underpowered.
 
man if that first one didn't have pimp my ride alloys it would be lush, matte black is the way forward
 
First one is satin black, not matte.

By all accounts, anything less than the 4.2 is pointless - less power and the same mpg.

*n
 
I dunno Penski, i'd be willing to bet the 6 pots are more economical. This is certainly the case in the S-class which is likely even heavier than these A8's.
 
Surely that would further re-inforce the point that the 6pots are like to be more frugal? Less weight to lug around and thus less underpowered for the weight?
 
Jez said:
Surely that would further re-inforce the point that the 6pots are like to be more frugal? Less weight to lug around and thus less underpowered for the weight?
Click to expand...
I know...I'm only going by what owners have said elsewhere. :)

*n
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom