(whether it's defeated later or not)
Where your argument falls down, because it always is. There's people out there already playing Spore.
Actually, my argument doesn't fall down at all. Dishonest people are the reason why publishers want to implement DRM. If people stopped being dishonest, DRM would no longer be necessary.
You appear to be saying that because dishonest people can break it, it's pointless. That's a moot point. If the dishonest people weren't being dishonest in the first place, it would never have been implemented.
Speaking of moot points, DRM being on games is a moot point in itself because it doesn't work. Ever.
But, hey, if publishers want to treat everyone like a criminal and impose a punishment that pirates don't have to deal with, that's fine. I'm going to enjoy Spore until my pre-ordered legit copy arrives.![]()
I cant beleive some people honestly think that games should to totaly unprotected. Would you leave your house unlocked?
Spores a good example of a game that will benefit from buying it, theres additional good online content that makes it worth buying.
If cracking it meant just using a legitimate cd key they wouldnt be very good crackers![]()
Think that depends, it's only user created creatures and what not.
A good example of a game you benefit from buying is basically any game that has a multiplayer element, CoD2 for example.
Which is, of course, not true. DRM works very well to deter casual pirates and works to reduce piracy in that way. It doesn't stop the determined pirates, and those determined to be dishonest with software, but it does mean they can't claim it's accidentalIn addition, repeating something that has already been adddressed, without actually addressing the comment isn't particularly a good debate approach...
Well done, thanks for proving the point. While people are determined to be dishonest, have no patience or just want something for nothing, their behaviour makes things harder for the rest of us.
Their public view is that since it will be cracked anyway, there's no point spending a load of time/money on it.
Debating approach is irrelevant if you're just going to say my arguments are "moot points" when they're not, why should I even bother wasting my time? Might as well talk to a wall.
Yup, welcome to real life. People aren't all the paragons of honour and virtue like you are, they never have been and they never will be. This is why DRM is a futile exercise, and hey, publishers probably know it but they'll treat the legitimate buyers (this includes you) like criminals. If you're happy with this, then *shrugs*.
Sounds like one company at least has the right idea. Instead of treating legitimate buyers like criminals and spending tons of money on chocolate teapot protection (that is no doubt factored into the retail cost of the finished product), they focus on making and selling games instead.
I'm still all for personal responsibility. Moaning about DRM while talking about how easy it is to bypass and how you dishonestly obtain games is really quite hypocritical.