Ars Technica have reviewed it:
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/games/spore-review.ars
"Civilization in a Dull, Drab World"... Ouch!
Then again they're probably wrong since it's a generally negative review, they obviously had too high expectations for the game which therefore renders their point of view entirely invalid from the get-go. Like the legion of other negative reviews all pointing out the same flaws (I call them "features") they went in looking for something that was never promised to begin with and concentrated on fickle points like "gameplay" and "depth".
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/games/spore-review.ars
"Civilization in a Dull, Drab World"... Ouch!
Then again they're probably wrong since it's a generally negative review, they obviously had too high expectations for the game which therefore renders their point of view entirely invalid from the get-go. Like the legion of other negative reviews all pointing out the same flaws (I call them "features") they went in looking for something that was never promised to begin with and concentrated on fickle points like "gameplay" and "depth".