I know you can't in real-life as it stands... but given chance I would honestly, genuinely, put him away for a good 10 years simply for having 100k paedo pics, and saying he would like a child to abuse. Child abuse is the most abhorrent crime in the world to me, and i have had no personal experience with it that would lead me on any "crusade". It's just the most heinous crime in my opinion.
Why bother locking these people up...
- Thread starter GSXRMovistar
- Start date
What some of you lot should consider is that it costs a small fortune to kill someone as ethically as possible, for example in the usa it costs more money to kill someone on deathrow than imprisoning them for life.
http://www.deathpenalty.org/article.php?id=42
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_United_States
As has been said though, its no crime to have negative intentions unless you carry them out, not quite at the minority report stage yet im afraid.
http://www.deathpenalty.org/article.php?id=42
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_United_States
As has been said though, its no crime to have negative intentions unless you carry them out, not quite at the minority report stage yet im afraid.
Is it OK to tell people you want to have sex with children that aren't your own?
Let's take it further; how about the guy in another thread on OcUK, who made a joke about 'The smell of a 3yr olds vagina'? Should we go beat him up, and throw him in jail?
At what point does a thought become a crime, of the same magnitude as actually having committed it? I always have fantasies of going on an Ocean's 11 style Bank rampage, but I don't plan on actually doing it. At least, not yet.
Do you think a man with 100k child porn pics would be "making a joke" on an internet chatroom with other paedos? Are you really comparing that to a tasteless joking comment made by some goon on this forum?
...can we just not kill them now and save wasting money (and hopefully show others they can't get away with this stuff).
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/south_west/7612338.stm
In regards to having his own kids...
For this he gets just four years! Hopefully this press coverage will continue so that the rest of the inmates are aware and he ends up having a nasty accident.
He should be neutered
imo that attitude is messed up. If he doesn't directly deserve to die for a crime, then it's not up to us to decide his fate
you can't just go around killing people who you feel are wasteful :/No, it's a basic human right.
imo that attitude is messed up. If he doesn't directly deserve to die for a crime, then it's not up to us to decide his fate
Not even Jade Goody or Kerry Catona?
Why?
Like many others you seem to be under the impression that all paedophiles physically sexual abuse children, they do not.
Not even Jade Goody or Kerry Catona?
Not even them, I know your joking, but if you seriously think that your messed up in my opinion.
Do you think a man with 100k child porn pics would be "making a joke" on an internet chatroom with other paedos? Are you really comparing that to a tasteless joking comment made by some goon on this forum?
But by your reasoning, how do we know it was just a tasteless joking comment made by some goon on this forum? He could be some kind of freaky Paedo King.
I'd hate to have been the person to research that.
I would hope the sentence was extended as you cannot believe anyone in their right mind would release an abomination like this. Can you imagine the consequences? In any event I believe he has sealed his own fate. Of course he'll either lie to say he is better or make out he is suffering from a mental illness.As long as he is a risk to the public I can't see him being released.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2006
- Posts
- 3,746
Death penalty no, chemical castration yes. This guy is obviously a threat to children and even if he never touches a child, his perverted needs are fuelling the filming of this filth. I can't believe some people are defending him for looking at this sort of stuff. Don't they realise that these are real children? Does their suffering mean nothing?
Last edited:
But they provide a 'market' for people to. They will encourage others to do it so they can pleasure themselves to children being abused.
imo that attitude is messed up. If he doesn't directly deserve to die for a crime, then it's not up to us to decide his fate
Why cant we decide someones fate based on our laws? Whats wrong with killing wasteful people? Infact if you think about it, it is negative to keep them alive. Do you think this planet has enough resources to house people like that?
Last edited:
Being dressed in all black, with a back of tools that are perfect to break into a property, in the middle of the night, being found behind a wall by the police - intent to commit
Saying 'i'm going to rob a house tonite' on a forum or chat room, which having cached vids of breakins from youtube - not intent to commit.
come on, have some sense tbh.
When we do a report we count them separately - thumbnails will have a category all on their own, as will deleted pics and live pictures. But I guess the media will generally lump them all together into one count.
100k is a lot though, more than four times as much as the most I've ever seen on a job.
100k is a lot though, more than four times as much as the most I've ever seen on a job.