Moving off With No Throttle, Bad?

Associate
Joined
9 Oct 2005
Posts
2,437
Location
Berkshire
Evening,

I've been thinking about this on-and-off the last few times I've been sitting on the M4 crying to myself as the traffic stops and starts like something that stops and starts.

When we move off, I'll often just start her moving with no throttle, just clutch up slow enough so it doesn't stall. Now, just thinking now I have two thoughts (related to this topic):

1/ clutch may be used for longer to avoid stalling = wear
2/ less revs to bring it up to, so less wear

Anyway, that's my rudimentary understanding of it and I would welcome others opinions.
 
Good for clutch, not so good for the engine - depends how much juddering you get (if any)

what damage can it do engine wise? My clutch judders a lot,but Ive just learnt to live with it, just means more revs when pulling away. Should I be getting it sorted asap?
 
^ Nah wouldn't think so. I meant the more severe type of juddering where the engine is borderline stalling..

If I try pulling away in my car with no throttle it's easy to stall if you aren't really paying attention.

I guess its all about how much torque the engine makes at idle RPM.
 
I guess its all about how much torque the engine makes at idle RPM.

torque has a lot to do with it, my Mondeo TD hates pulling away @ tickover , my Scania HGV has no such problems - tbh it probably develops 300nm+ @ tickover (I'll have to find out!)

I do this all the time, even @ idle, my truck will happily pull away on tickover (even on a slight hill), not bad when your pulling 28tons (44t gross) :cool:

Scania advise me that this is far better for the clutch than pulling away with revs, its very easy to smoke an HGV's clutch, even with a semi-auto gearbox setup.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom