Anyone else think bikes look totally "wrong" without proper exhaust cans going up the back? The gap looks dead silly imo.
The Aprilia V4 also looks nothing like that pic, official pictures have been released now: http://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/News/newsresults/mcn/2008/september/15-21/sep2108-aprilia-rsv4-revealed/?&R=EPI-103042. Ugly, but brilliant. Looks much nicer in race bike form (so headlight covers, end can and removed mirrors for the road maybe?).
I love SP-1's and SP-2's. Considering one as my next bike. I've seen a few RC8's now and they do seem like nice bikes though.
[ui]ICEMAN;12571736 said:We have an RC8 coming in a couple of weeks I believe, I'll get some pics up when it arrives along with the MV RR's and the Monster Tricolore![]()
what is the real bhp, torque and weight on these bikes ?, everywhere on the web says different... some sites it looks lardy and underpowered, others a missile. Seems to be comparable to a 1098 ducati ? (I know power / weight are not the be all and end all of a good bike... but when right they make for a exciting ride)
I would never buy a KTM since the incident where they refused 'long way round' bikes as they thought they were too unreliable... would you trust a manufacturer with no faith in their own bikes ?. Maybe harsh.. but that stuck with me at time and put me off the brand.
Whilst i agree the SP1 is awesome (still) its nice to have a change. Getting a test ride on the RC8 today, and gonna try for an 08 blade test drive as well just to see how the RC8 compares to the best 1litre jap bike this year.
Unless roger at Revolution can make it a few years noewer and a few 10s of kilos lighter, we'll see![]()
The RSV4 looks beautiful but it's got the wrong number of cylinders![]()
Had my firestorm fettled by Roger, transformed the handling from a wallowing beast into a much more rideable bike.