£5 To Winning Spec

PwnDirect said:
A Decent CPU :

cpu

i see quite a few suggesting going for quad cores, the majority of games don’t support quad cores!
so for a fast gaming rig a faster duel core is the only real choice better.
the above cpu can be oced easily to 4ghz on air.
which will be easy using this cooler noctua don’t make pretty things, but they are damn cool & quiet.

silent (important) and cool case :

case

this case is without a doubt one of if not the quietest pc cases commercially available.

as shown in this review & also in the overall rankings here.

The only quieter case is the Zalman & I have been unable to find any retailers anywhere for it & would most likely be all your budget :D

PSU and cooler :

Seen a lot of corsairs being advised but if you want the best there is only one name. Who do both ATI & NVIDIA turn to for there test rigs? : PCP&C

A Decent motherboard :

I will let this Motherboardspeak for itself :D

Seriously Awesome graphics card (or two?) :

Well this graphics Card is not only awesome but there’s 2 of it :p

4870 x2 I have chosen the Asus as they always have the best accessories & extras as well as the longest warranty. The Asus version always sells out for those reasons. :eek:

4gb of good ram :

People have been advising the cheaper ram with no heat sinks :eek:!
This stuff is lighting fast & damn cool Ram

fast hdd doesn't need to be too big as i don't store much :

With games these days being 5gb-15gb & fraps eating gb's alive small hard drives aren’t an option. This drive offers great speed & value for money, The raptors may be fast but on you budget simply aren’t worth getting over a faster cpu/gpu.

Might buy myself this spec tbh :D

Subtotal £849.92
£998.66 inc VAT
Click to expand...

It's only a fiver! :p
 
Capture-113.png
 
Nice specs, but where's the operating systems and the monitors ?
and we still don't know if he even needs an OS and a monitor I hate when people aren't more specific.
 
shaffaaf27 said:
Capture-113.png
Click to expand...

this is good, personally id get the 8400, scrap that bloody corsair ram and get OCZ for 60pounds, and pay more for the case or a sound card

@OP you got too many posts, its now too hard to sort through everything and your gonna have more ideas and questions than decisions
 
Last edited:
well tbh he hasnt asked for one, so i didnt put one in.

cheers platinum, IMO the E0 stepping is worth the extra, unless you can guarantee the E0 E8400, inwhich case go for that.
 
umm please do not spread fud:

http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=770&p=0

There were certainly a number of interesting results recorded when testing such a large range of processors with the Radeon HD 4870 X2. Perhaps the most interesting thing that we have noticed is how much faster the Core 2 Quad processors were when compared to the Core 2 Duo’s, this is not something that we have really seen before.

Generally the performance margin between the Core 2 Duo and Phenom X4 processors was quite minimal, though more often than not the Intel dual-core processors did outperform the AMD quad-core parts. This is neither new nor surprising, as we have seen this time and time again in the past.

Although it was not all that surprising to see just how much the Athlon64 X2 architecture has aged since we last looked at it, we were still somewhat shocked at how slow the 3.46GHz 6400+ processor was. Obviously we do not expect that AMD Athlon64 X2 owners are going to race out and purchase a Radeon HD 4870 X2, but we still felt that including this processor series would be useful. Those still using an Athlon64 X2 should seriously consider upgrading their platform, even if they only plan to purchase a single current generation AMD or Nvidia graphics card.

Out of the five games used for testing, Devil May Cry was the only one that allowed the processors to find the limits of the Radeon HD 4870 X2. It would seem that this game is more GPU dependent than the others, as the Phenom X4 9850/9950 and Core 2 Quad Q6600/9650 processors were able to max out the graphics card. While the Core 2 Duo processors also did very well in this game, the overclocked 3.46GHz Athlon64 X2 6400+ processor was slower than the E6320.

Another game that strongly favored the quad-core processors was Enemy Territory Quake Wars. Here the Core 2 Quad Q9650 managed 133fps, while the Q6600 averaged 119fps. The Phenom X4 processors were next in line, with the 9950 averaging 115fps, and the 9850 reached 113fps. In fact the Phenom X4 9750 and 9650 processors were also able to outperform the E6850, which only narrowly edged out the 9550.

The Supreme Commander results were more like what we were expecting. Here the Core 2 Quad processors were only slightly faster than the dual-core versions, while the Phenom X4 processors were able to match the Core 2 Duo’s for the most part. However, Supreme Commander was another game that continually saw the Radeon HD 4870 X2 become faster, as the processors became more powerful and we never really saw the limits.

Finally, Unreal Tournament 3 painted an interesting picture, as there was a significant difference in performance between the fastest and the slowest processors tested. Once again the Core 2 Quad Q9650 was the king here, delivering 132fps at its default clock frequency of 3.0GHz, which was impressive when compared to the E6850 for example, which managed just 118fps at the same frequency. The best Phenom X4 processor was of course the 9950, which averaged 113fps, edging out the old E6700 by 2fps.

Again the Radeon HD 4870 X2 limits were not seen, as the results continued to improve with the processors clock speed. While we always suspected that the world’s fastest graphics card would require the world’s fastest processor, we know now for certain that it does. Those with lower-end Core 2 Duo/Quad processors can squeeze a great deal of performance out of the Radeon HD 4870 X2 simply by overclocking their processor past 3.0GHz, which is well within the limits of these processors.

Due to a lack of raw clock speed, the Phenom X4 processors did fall short in most tests, and even at 3.0GHz the 9950 struggled with the competition. Given that all tests were conducted at 1920x1200 with 8xAA/16xAF enabled, the results were impressive, and while the Phenom X4 processors did deliver acceptable performance, processors such as the Core 2 Quad Q9650 proved that the Radeon HD 4870 X2 still has much more potential just waiting to be unleashed.

Reviewed By Steven Walton
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom