*** Official Call of Duty: World at War Thread ***

  • Thread starter Thread starter 4p
  • Start date Start date
Can people please start to explain why this game is 'crap'? Its basically COD4 with different skins/maps/weapons... and seen as COD4 was so highly regarded by this forum, I dont understand the blanket slating its getting.

Especially seen as my brief experience of the beta so far has been great. Same gameplay as COD4, with new maps and weapons to mess about with.

Im not so keen on the tanks however, but then i never have liked vehicles.
 
Can people please start to explain why this game is 'crap'? Its basically COD4 with different skins/maps/weapons... and seen as COD4 was so highly regarded by this forum, I dont understand the blanket slating its getting.

Especially seen as my brief experience of the beta so far has been great. Same gameplay as COD4, with new maps and weapons to mess about with.

Im not so keen on the tanks however, but then i never have liked vehicles.

I think its because absolutely no effort was put in. £40 for a COD4 mod? No thanks.

Sure it has the same gameplay features, but then why bother paying for WaW? There is nothing new here.
 
Whoops. Forgot this was the PC thread! :D

I guess if the SP is good, then its alright. But multiplayer is a disappointment.
 
I prefer the modern day setting of cod4 personally, i had 30 mins on the beta this morning and i wasnt too impressed, i dont like the feel of the guns, im hoping that it improves with perks, but we will see..
 
Feels like cod 4 to me, arcadey aiming and that stupid radar which lets you see where people are which i find defeats the purpose of using your eyes.
 
Last edited:
Uhhh no, cause the gameplay is totally different between the two. COD4 doesn't play, feel or look the same as COD2. WaW looks the same, feels the same and plays the exact same.

So what, does every game have to be different? Why is this a problem if the gameplay with COD4 was good enough.

Gameplay is also about map layout, and since none of the maps are the same as COD4, its unlikely that the gameplay is gonna be 'exactly the same'.
 
So what, does every game have to be different? Why is this a problem if the gameplay with COD4 was good enough.

Gameplay is also about map layout, and since none of the maps are the same as COD4, its unlikely that the gameplay is gonna be 'exactly the same'.

Every game doesn't need to be different. But a game that is a sequal (not technically but it has predecessors) and is made by a different company should not be almost identical in gameplay terms to that of a game by a completely different company.

They have obviously run out of ideas and are just copying now. Really quite sad.
 
Every game doesn't need to be different. But a game that is a sequal (not technically but it has predecessors) and is made by a different company should not be almost identical in gameplay terms to that of a game by a completely different company.

They have obviously run out of ideas and are just copying now. Really quite sad.


(long sentence alert) :

Hmm it does seem rather like that but I guess we'll have to wait til the full thing comes out to see for sure as none of us have played the campaign and multiplayer is bound to be much of the same as COD4.
 
(long sentence alert) :

Hmm it does seem rather like that but I guess we'll have to wait til the full thing comes out to see for sure as none of us have played the campaign and multiplayer is bound to be much of the same as COD4.

I agree. Singleplayer should be pretty good. I liked COD3 SP and with the gameplay similar to COD4 it should be great.

I'm just annoyed that they couldn't think of anything that new for multiplayer.
 
My review (as a serious CoD gamer since CoD1):

The weapons:

Bolt rifles are almost useless due to them being a two shot kill from the torso downards (this was NEVER the CoD way of doing rifles). They have messed with an almost 7 year old idea that wasn't even in need of change.

Sniper is too slow in almost every respect, the zoom into the scopes, the bolt action to load the new bullet. The breath barely does any steadying of the Scope.

Semi autos dominate, especially the Gewehr due to it's serious lack of recoil and uber strength. Why have a slow and weak Bolt Rifle when you can use these bad boys?

Garand has masses of recoil and is weaker than the Gewehr so no need to bother with this gun.

SMG's are strange, sometimes they WTFSAUSAGERAPE and sometimes they barely kill one person. I've cleared rooms of 10 people with the Thompson and other times just wasted a clip on a Juggarnoob fag. The MP40 shoots quite slow considering and has some strange recoil. Not the best choice.

LMG's... lol... The BAR shoots at the same rate as the Garand, the Bren is a recoil less cannibalistic pwn cannon so your better off using that.

Grenades:

Severely weakened Frag grenades compared to COD4, much better IMO. Molotiv cocktails seem 'meh' at best and the Tank grenades are OK.

The Gas that royally screws up your vision and sensitivity is always fun, the flares are near blinding if you use them properly and the smokes PLAIN SUCK. No joke, the smokes are useless :/

Perks:

Consolised crap that should never have been introduced to CoD, fact.

If you don't use stopping power your a fool because your weapons are SO weak without it. Most of the perks aren't worth it tbh.

Maps:

Makin: Terrible map. Simple as that. People are near invisible on it, you can camp almost everywhere. It's too dark, SMG's and Semi's dominate this map. Everything is penetrable which is SO annoying, worst map in the BETA.

Caslte: Great SD and WAR map, love it. Has more structure and you can tell they put thought into this map. All weapons are effective on this map. Nice thick walls to take cover behind, being lamed through walls is NOT fun.

Roundhouse: The russian tank is buggy as hell, i jumped in and it started to fly around the map. NICE. Great map overall, a very Rifle dominated map with the Snipers being utilized on the walkways etc. Lots of close combat in the Roundhouse section of the map and around the edges.

Kill Streaks:


Recon plane: Too easy to get and the radar is just a copy of CoD4 and it does not suit the WWII era.

Artillery: I dunno about this, it sounds like BF2142 artillery and rarely does huge amounts of damage. It screams down in an annoying fashion and tricks you into its dangerous when it really isn't.

Dogs: An flamboyance that needs to be removed, it's too easy to get Dogs and they just distracts you from the core gameplay (which is lacking). They knife/bayonet on the dogs is buggy too.

Things that **** me off:

The sound, omg what did they do to it? I can't hear people next to me, i can't hear them shooting or anything.

Why can i hear Quake3 sounds as well, it's when bullets and nades hit metal and it very much sounds like Quake3's hit blip sound.

The **** poor Japanese in game voices.

Bullet registration is just as bad as CoD4 if not worse.

Bad review i know, was very rushed and this is a BETA so...

Not impressed with it at all, Treyarch clearly don't care about the PC because this is one pissbag console port. They added a friends system that is very cool but the core gameplay really needs work.

Call of Duty United Offensive tops this game by a country mile.
 
Cheers Thorpy mate - was waiting to see what you thought of it - I have to admit going back to WWII really made me think 'Meh' so was hoping to be proven wrong...

Ive signed up to the site and will try and get a beta key but in the middle of upgrading so dno when Ill get a chance to play around with it...

ps3ud0 :cool:
 
Back
Top Bottom