Is this still classed as a family site?
- Thread starter Tibbs
- Start date
I'm curious... Is anal sex (I assume that's what you mean by sodomy) somehow less family friendly than ordinary sex?
That wasnt really my point, but yes I would say so and certainly less "family friendly" than swear words.
Son: dad, whats sex?
Dad: well Billy, when a man loves a woman, they have sex. it means putting your penis in a womans vagina. and sometimes her butt.
At the risk of baiting the people who are obviously for 'I'd hit it' type threads as there is nowhere else to view that sort of thing; this place is as good as it is because it is different to all the **** sites out there that allow almost anything. Yeah, it is populated by young males but that is no excuse for allowing them to demonstrate how puerile they are; never mind the " don't click on it" comments, how about, use a bit of common sense and decorum whilst attempting to post something other than thinly disguised ****?
Trying to justify swearing and iffy pictures by saying that youngsters can find and view them on billboards, mags and TV etc, is wrong and IMO, ..... just because one can (anything) doesn't mean one should.
Spie has given his opinion and although I believe that things are getting more lax and that the common decency approach should be adopted by some posters, maybe his word should be the final judgement.
Trying to justify swearing and iffy pictures by saying that youngsters can find and view them on billboards, mags and TV etc, is wrong and IMO, ..... just because one can (anything) doesn't mean one should.
Spie has given his opinion and although I believe that things are getting more lax and that the common decency approach should be adopted by some posters, maybe his word should be the final judgement.
Ok, now where does oral sex fit into all this?
I think you should have been playing a game with them rather than sitting on here, I doubt you'd be asking if they were 12+ so I believe you should play Monopoly or Risk, teach them world domination you know you want to. (Not kerplunk that game is ******* loud)
I'm siding with tisonlyme and the delectable Vix. Who cares, it's only ladies in their knickers it is hardly explicit hardcore stuff. If you have such a problem with it, don't click the link, i've not bothered to again after opening it and finding out what it was all about. 
i've not bothered to again after opening it and finding out what it was all about.
Was the title not a give away?
There is a thread on pistonheads called 'Post your fantasy' and there are a worrying number of women on that forum and a worrying number of scantily clad men!
Basmic comes to mind. He was permabanned for having a sig with two males kissing. Oh the outrage.
Do as they say, and not as they do, eh?
*waits for post to disappear, as if by magic*
That's BS and I don't know whether you just made it up to be argumentative or if that's what you've been led to believe
He'd had more suspensions than anyone else I can think of and was on at least his 4th final warning for general stupidity, it was his attitude that earned him a ban not his signature, tough luck.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=17887288
Yeah, pretty much but i'm nosey.Was the title not a give away?
Sigh what? You complained about anal sex being non family friendly with an example of it being hard to explain to a child. I'm curious to know where the far more mainstream practice of oral sex fits into that line of reasoning.
Good god man, you can't use logic on the internet.
I agree, religious discussion should be banned!
Why would you want to attack someones appearance? A difference of opinion is one thing but this is going a bit to far.
Ouch