The clio 172/182 happens to be exceptionally expensive to insure for whatever reason, most other cars should be easily within your grasp. For instance, even though I live in a good estate - my post code happens to be fairly high risk?!? Yet I can still can get insured on the vast majority of cars.
I'm in group B for post code (A being best and F being worst I think?) and car will be kept on a driveway in a good area of the south east.
[TW]Fox;12866695 said:
MOT's are NOTHING to be worried about on a decent, well maintained car of any age.
As an example, my previous car, a 1999 Ford Mondeo with 155,000 miles on the clock (Note: This is NOT a recommendation) has last week again passed it's MOT with zero advisories. Nothing. Infact, in the entire 4 years I've had it/known it, it has never, ever failed an MOT. It is now a 9 year old Ford with the sort of mileage that would make you faint. It doesn't fail MOT's and has cost a whole £100 in unscheduled repairs in the last 4.5 years.
So why would a 4-5 year old Seat or Fiesta?
I was saying to my friend the other day about people who buy old Mondeo's and run them to they fail and then buy another one as it's so much cheaper than buying a new car.
Being 19 you also have to consider I want something that looks cool. A 9 year old Mondeo would not, a 2 year old Mondeo would get me a fair few dodgy looks I'd imagin as well.
My GF has a 9 year old KA and is terrible, horrible to drive, crap inside and costs her an arm and a leg every 12 months.
The old-shape Seat Leon Cupra or Fiesta ST would be my choice. Both good hot-hatches and costing ~£6k-£7k. Being the old shape doesn't really matter, does it? I mean, who cares if its the latest, if you're actually getting the better product for thousands of pounds less, simply because someone has used it a bit first? Its not like some really dubiously made old Lada, being ~3 years old isn't the end of the world.
As for requiring an MOT, this is in no way a bad thing - if your car isn't capable of passing an MOT it shouldn't be on the road! I drive a dodgy old Rover and the only issue that came up at an MOT was a slightly blowing exhaust downpipe - they're really not a problem. Sensible != something to ignore. I mean, my mum's Honda Civic has been bulletproof and that's 7 years old now - a very sensible choice, in fact. If you want sensible, buy the old-shape Civic - it will cost you £4k-ish and be indestructible, do a bit over 40mpg, be low on insurance and never break down.
Going on that I might as well buy a City Rover

saw one for sale the other day 07 plate, 19k on the clock £1750! Buy one of those every 5 years, but seriously no.
My mum drives an M reg £525 Rover 214 and it's been great to her, but theres no way in hell I'm going to get one of those.
I love the old Seat Leons and I'm gonna have a look for some now, thanks.
As for old shape, I'd just like it to be a new shape, spending all this money and to walk away with a car thats not new, not stupidly fast, not uber cool and not even the latest model would make me feel a bit crud.
Forgot to meantion another part of me getting a new car is to make me feel better, I'm going through a very difficult time atm and I long for a car to be proud of. Might seem stupid to some people but it would make me happy to have a nice car.