Why do you assume to only reason to purchase a more economical car is to save money?
what other reason..
a. they want to spend more on a car?
b. they want less flammable fuel?
c. they have diesel jeans and want a matching set?
what other reason..
a. they want to spend more on a car?
b. they want less flammable fuel?
c. they have diesel jeans and want a matching set?
When I owned my TDCi Mondeo for a 6 month period just 2.5 years ago there were times when diesel was cheaper than unleaded.
it would be more realistic to compare petrol cars that average nearer 30mpg, as not everyone can afford modern day efficient Petrol FSI cars.
What has "modern" got to do with it? My 21 year old Volvo 340 1.7 Petrol returns about 42mpg (combined) so the OP 39.8pmg is, to be honest, totally reasonable.
Chris.
Unless you buy a petrol car that is quite new, they typically aren't engineered to be amazingly economical.
what other reason..
a. they want to spend more on a car?
b. they want less flammable fuel?
c. they have diesel jeans and want a matching set?
Oh really? When I owned my Peugeot 306 XLd diesel was more than petrol, and that was 3.5 years ago and for about 18 months.
The only time diesel has been cheaper than petrol was before I started driving over 4 years ago, getting on for 5. :/
Maybe they were talking about being more green? In which case, aren't Diesel's worse for the environment anyway?
[TW]Fox;12956928 said:He means some people 'prefer the way they drive' which is what many diesel owners will use to hide the fact they bought into the economy lie.
'yea I love the instant slug of torque that lasts for 2 seconds and rattles the crap out of my dashboard at idle'