Some of the Mumbai terrorists are British born Pakistanis

Associate
Joined
27 Jun 2006
Posts
1,473
Just heard this as I walked past the TV, up to 7 of the Mumbai individuals involved with hostage taking / bombings / killings have been identified as British born Pakistanis from Leeds.

How come they haven't captured all the people involved but they can still say 7 are British born, even narrowing it down to Leeds!

Its probably well known, but didn't get back to the TV in time to hear what the main story was about and the websites don't appear to have the same details.
 
And where you saying the same thing when the IRA where in the UK bombing Manchester and the like? Or is multiculturalism only a bad thing when "they" aren't white?

I'm against all forms of terrorism, the skin colour of the terrorist is irrelevant.
 
I just found it strange that if there is a UK connection, how they narrowed it down to one city without actually capturing anyone!

Washington Post said:
In India, Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister of the state of Maharashtra, which includes Mumbai, told reporters that two of the captured gunmen were British citizens of Pakistani origin. He gave no details.

Looks like they did capture some according to that article.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/28/AR2008112801718.html?hpid=topnews
 
So it has **** all to do with multiculturalism then.

The allegations that British born Muslims are going abroad committing terrorist atrocities has everything to do with multiculturalism. This is the inevitable consequence of a multiculturalist policy known as Londonistan
 
Back
Top Bottom