Hey,don't get me wrong,I'm certainly no bible basher!
The argument put forward is that Saturated Fats are unhealthy,I'm just trying to provide sound information which counters that argument,it just so happens the 'biblelife ministries' site links to a wealth of info on the subject.
This link is probably the most informative,providing a good balance of info without all the religous clap trap.
http://www.healingnaturallybybee.com/articles/menu3_3.php
naturally bee also uses this website as one of its sources
http://www.christiansoldierscross.com/pass_the_butter.htm
I took a good, long read through the rescources you've posted. Healing naturally bee uses flawed and non-existant sources for the most part, although some of the information regarding the benefits of butter are sound. And the information regarding the nutritional benefits was both interesting, and I corroberated it from other sources. However, half of the healthy acids found in butter it bangs on about are from unsaturated fatty acids

Most of it is moot anyway as the body sytnethises many, many fatty acids required for operation. It also states that it contains the fat soluble vitamins A, E, K and D. All of which are widely available in a host of other foods. As is the case for every other micronutrient stated, they can be obtained from healthier, low fat altneratives.
Then the website didn't even bother to segment the different types of cholesterol, and went on to state that cholesterol is good, and that medical proffessionals state it isn't; "Despite all of the misinformation you may have heard, cholesterol is needed to maintain intestinal health, but is also needed for brain and nervous system development in the young" Yeah, we already knew that, cheers.
The first websites primary source of information is a study conducted in 1949, it also uses extremist and scare-monger language like "deadly" when describing wholegrains

It also discusses heart desease figures in 1990, which is ridiculous, as medicine wasn't equipped to assess coronary heart desease as a cause, and the ECG was even invented until the 1920s, and wasn't credited as a viable or useful tool until much later (the website itself even refers to this!) It also begins with some half-baked story about an aquaintance doctor he knew who lived the healthy lifestyle but keeled over, got cances, whilst the missus got cancer... it just got veryy farcical. With no evidence, no testimonials or interviews, in fact nothing to demonstrate that it wasn't a complete fabrication, it lost credibility with me very quickly.
Also, anything mentioned regarding polyunsaturates and cooking is itself a misinformation, as this is NOT what's suggested (due to the fact that polyunsaturates have more double bonded carbons which can be hydrogenised) by any governmental body or foundation.
Omega 3 and 6 unbalance can cause major inflammatory illness as well as other issues, HOWEVER, healthy diets that contain a good source won't contribute to this, so the point is moot for the people among whom you're chatting and the dietry beliefs we hold.
The evidence you've presented did supply some valid and interesting points, and I for the most part, enjoyed a good read and even learnt more about the nutritional composition of butter.
However, the evidence is staggeringly underwhelming, whilst a whole host of independant and governmental research exists (I did LMFAO when the bible website started declaring that all people in the medical proffession were soulless hacks and that the studies produced were all funded by margarine companies who were out to thwart healthy eating) affirming the contrary.
The American and British heart foundation websites are a great place to start and will link a whole host of research. Also, have a google into the effects longer term of ketone bodies on the system (interesting the amount on seizure control!)
The coconut website was actually very, very interesting for me. I enjoyed it, and 'learnt' a shed load. Unfortunately, it didn't source any peer-approved studies to confirm its findings, which is a shame. However I have bookmarked it, and some of the information on butter too.
Nice one for opening my eyes to the postive effects to what I would deem no-go foods, and thanks for actually starting something that could be really interesting to discuss. I'd be very interested if you've any other information regarding this saturated fat debate? preferably from medical journals or proper independant research.
All that said, I won't be having fried egg and bacon for breakfast any time soon
