Police Camera Action, Drink Driving special

Frankly, it'd make naff all difference to the accident statistics to tighten the drink drive limits; all your going to do is criminalise more people who've not done anything wrong. Tiredness, lack of driver skill (and sense), improper vehicle maintainance, bad road design and upkeep and the like are all more significant contributions to road accidents that someone having a single drink and then driving.
 
The question is, when can you then drive? I had quite a heavy night and woke up about 11am. I got in about midnight and thought I should be fine (1 unit per hour). I didn't feel ok to drive so I slept another few hours. I felt better, but for I know I could have been over the limit at 2pm or under the limit at 11am. Maybe a tester would be a useful piece of kit.



Assume one unit an hour elimination from the time you stop drinking and it's unlikely you'll have a problem. Of course it's far more complicated than that, and many people underestimate how many units of alcohol in a drink (most pub pints are actually about 2.4-2.6 rather than 2 for instance), but it's about the only clue I can give you.


The problem with testers is that everyone would drink up to the limit on the tester, and as has been pointed out, your driving is impaired long before you hit the limit. Tests have shown that risk-taking increases after a single drink.


M
 
Alcohol affects everyone in different ways due to height, weight, what youve eaten etc. Sometimes after a pint if ive eaten nothing ( thats not to say im drunk) i can feel it affecting me and there is no way i would even consider driving - having said that i never drink and drive anyway.
 
Assume one unit an hour elimination from the time you stop drinking and it's unlikely you'll have a problem. Of course it's far more complicated than that, and many people underestimate how many units of alcohol in a drink (most pub pints are actually about 2.4-2.6 rather than 2 for instance), but it's about the only clue I can give you.

Like I said, I tried that but either underestimated or it took longer to be processed by my system. Either way I had no idea if I should be driving or not.

The problem with testers is that everyone would drink up to the limit on the tester, and as has been pointed out, your driving is impaired long before you hit the limit. Tests have shown that risk-taking increases after a single drink.

Testers can always be abused if they're not used correctly, but I think in my situation it would be useful to know if I need to push other commitments out the way a little longer so that I really am safe to drive.
 
Like I said, I tried that but either underestimated or it took longer to be processed by my system. Either way I had no idea if I should be driving or not.

It's also only even vaguely true when you have significant quantities of alcohol in your system; low levels can persist for much longer. And it varies by individual to a large degree.
 
The woman who said "I actually think I'm a safer driver when I've had a drink because I make sure I concentrate 100%" or something. What a stupid thing to say! Why aren't you concentrating 100% all the time when you're driving?

That was the worst "argument" for drink driving I've ever heard.
 
The woman who said "I actually think I'm a safer driver when I've had a drink because I make sure I concentrate 100%" or something. What a stupid thing to say! Why aren't you concentrating 100% all the time when you're driving?

That was the worst "argument" for drink driving I've ever heard.

Because you concentrate 100% all the time on driving and never change the radio/cd player or talk to a passenger ;)

But yup, it was a daft program with some silly "test" at the end.
 
Back
Top Bottom